2017-03-30 16:02 GMT-06:00 Rich Shepard :
> On Thu, 30 Mar 2017, Laurent C. wrote:
>
>> In that case, you will not see the accumulation upstream the culvert that
>> should normally occur if the pipe is actually higher than the ground.
>
>
> Laurent,
>
> Both invert and
On Thu, 30 Mar 2017, Laurent C. wrote:
In that case, you will not see the accumulation upstream the culvert that
should normally occur if the pipe is actually higher than the ground.
Laurent,
Both invert and outfall are above ground level and below the road. If
r.carve used the mean
2017-03-30 12:38 GMT-06:00 Rich Shepard :
> On Thu, 30 Mar 2017, Laurent C. wrote:
>
>> You can create a new vector map and create a line that link the two
>> points. However, r.carve will interpolate the elevation between the start
>> point and the end point.
>
>
>
On Thu, 30 Mar 2017, Laurent C. wrote:
You can create a new vector map and create a line that link the two
points. However, r.carve will interpolate the elevation between the start
point and the end point.
Laurent,
If my visual interpretation of the output (detail of culvert attached) is
On Thu, 30 Mar 2017, Laurent C. wrote:
You can create a new vector map and create a line that link the two
points. However, r.carve will interpolate the elevation between the start
point and the end point.
Laurent,
Have this line in a vector map called 'stream.'
If you culvert invert
On Thu, 30 Mar 2017, Laurent C. wrote:
You need first to create a new vector map (or edit an existing one) and
select "digitize new line".
Laurent,
Oh. Didn't notice the combo box on the extreme left side. Sigh.
Thanks,
Rich
___
grass-user
2017-03-30 12:09 GMT-06:00 Rich Shepard :
> On Thu, 30 Mar 2017, Rich Shepard wrote:
>
>> Would the process be to use v.edit on a copy (called 'stream') of the
>> culvert point map to generate a straight line between the two points? That
>> would provide the vector input
2017-03-30 12:00 GMT-06:00 Rich Shepard :
> On Thu, 30 Mar 2017, Laurent C. wrote:
>
>> If you want to 'open' the culvert, you'll have to cut through the road.
>> You can do this with r.carve, for example.
>
>
> Certainly worth doing. The r.carve manual page requires as
On Thu, 30 Mar 2017, Rich Shepard wrote:
Would the process be to use v.edit on a copy (called 'stream') of the
culvert point map to generate a straight line between the two points? That
would provide the vector input r.carve wants.
How do I add a line between two specific points using the
On Thu, 30 Mar 2017, Laurent C. wrote:
If you want to 'open' the culvert, you'll have to cut through the road.
You can do this with r.carve, for example.
Certainly worth doing. The r.carve manual page requires as input a vector
map containing streams. Having only two points (culvert inlet
Rich,
If I understand well, you have a 'raw' DEM and you want to open the
culvert in that DEM.
If it is an under-road culvert, your 'raw' DEM will show the road
elevation, and the culvert will not be shown. i.e the culvert is
blocked.
If you want to 'open' the culvert, you'll have to cut through
On Thu, 30 Mar 2017, Rich Shepard wrote:
Germane to what Markus M. wrote, "The point locations used to edit the
original DEM are probably wrong (not close to the center), ..." I now
think that's where I made one mistake.
Nope. I zoom in to isolate those 4 cells in in the blocked map. No
On Thu, 30 Mar 2017, Nikos Alexandris wrote:
For the record: there is a "differences" color table which is useful for
this.
Don't forget to try r.colors with -e or -a -g if the first attempt does not
show much differences.
I _had_ not noticed the 'differences' color table. Applying that
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 2:46 AM, Rich Shepard
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 29 Mar 2017, Vaclav Petras wrote:
>
>> As Soeren mentioned in the other part of the thread, use r.univar to get
>> the statistics. Don't rely on just looking at the resulting raster map.
>> There can be
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 8:46 PM, Rich Shepard
wrote:
> n=140652
> null_cells=71271
> cells=211923
>
Relatively hight number of null cells.
> min=-1.89342188835144
> max=0.00093058729544282
> range=1.89435247564688
>
Probably small differences, but there is at least
Rich Shepard wrote:
No differences? Wrong syntax?
GRASS hung due to an initial syntax error; corrected.
Now I have the difference map which is a solid color using the elevation
color table. Ergo, no differences.
Moritz:
For the record: there is a "differences" color table which is
On Wed, 29 Mar 2017, Vaclav Petras wrote:
As Soeren mentioned in the other part of the thread, use r.univar to get
the statistics. Don't rely on just looking at the resulting raster map.
There can be things like outliers which may throw the visualization off.
Vaclav,
Here are the results
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Rich Shepard
wrote:
> Now I have the difference map which is a solid color...
> ...Ergo, no differences.
>
As Soeren mentioned in the other part of the thread, use r.univar to get
the statistics. Don't rely on just looking at the
On 28/03/17 22:30, Rich Shepard wrote:
On Tue, 28 Mar 2017, Rich Shepard wrote:
No differences? Wrong syntax?
GRASS hung due to an initial syntax error; corrected.
Now I have the difference map which is a solid color using the elevation
color table. Ergo, no differences.
For the
On Tue, 28 Mar 2017, Rich Shepard wrote:
No differences? Wrong syntax?
GRASS hung due to an initial syntax error; corrected.
Now I have the difference map which is a solid color using the elevation
color table. Ergo, no differences.
Rich
___
20 matches
Mail list logo