PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [GRASS-user] v.generalize / reanimation of dead lines ?
On 29.08.2008 18:54, Dylan Beaudette wrote:
I have noticed this behavior as well when using v.generalize. I will try
and
dig up the exact situation that caused it-- but I am pretty sure
@lists.osgeo.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], Daniel
Bundala [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [GRASS-user] v.generalize / reanimation of dead lines ?
On 29.08.2008 18:54, Dylan Beaudette wrote:
I have noticed this behavior as well when using v.generalize. I will try
and
dig up
: grass-user@lists.osgeo.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], Daniel
Bundala [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [GRASS-user] v.generalize / reanimation of dead lines ?
On 29.08.2008 18:54, Dylan Beaudette wrote:
I have noticed this behavior as well when using v.generalize. I
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Markus Metz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As far as I understand the source code v.generalize discards all
centroids and builds them anew at the end, area topology is not
maintained during simplification.
Dear all,
That is correct. The intention was that the
On Thursday 28 August 2008, Hamish wrote:
Peter:
when trying to derive a continous coast_line_ from the
GSHHS data set. For this, the data was reduced using
v.generalize (douglas, threshold=0.001).
Since the reduced coastline consists of several lines (with
individual
On 29.08.2008 18:54, Dylan Beaudette wrote:
I have noticed this behavior as well when using v.generalize. I will try and
dig up the exact situation that caused it-- but I am pretty sure that the
initial linework was correct = unclean deletion.
That is very much possible. This module is
Hi,
when trying to derive a continous coast_line_ from the GSHHS data set.
For this, the data was reduced using v.generalize (douglas, threshold=0.001).
Since the reduced coastline consists of several lines (with individual
categories), I tried v.build to snap them together into a (hopefully)
Peter,
Have you tried to v.build snap the lined before you generalize them?
--Wolf
On 28.08.2008 19:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
when trying to derive a continous coast_line_ from the GSHHS data
set. For this, the data was reduced using v.generalize (douglas,
threshold=0.001).