Re: [graylog2] Adds graylog2 some fields itself?

2014-08-22 Thread ellyas ellyas
These fields are added by logstash, or more precisely the gelf-rb module used to format GELF messages. They are added because they are required fields according to the GELF 1.0 spec. Did you probably mean values of that fields, but not fields itself? I have tried to use Syslog UDP

Re: [graylog2] Adds graylog2 some fields itself?

2014-08-22 Thread Martin Schütte
On 22.08.2014 08:29, ellyas ellyas wrote: Did you probably mean values of that fields, but not fields itself? I Both, I guess. Because a field can only be present with a value in it. (We could argue whether the empty string is a valid value for a GELF facility, but that does not lead anywhere.

Re: [graylog2] Adds graylog2 some fields itself?

2014-08-22 Thread Jochen Schalanda
Hi! Am Freitag, 22. August 2014 11:11:12 UTC+2 schrieb Martin Schütte: have tried to use Syslog UDP input without logstash, and there are also these 2 fields facility = unknown and level = Invalid [-1] (values are different from GELF). Version is gone. That is another topic; BSD

Re: [graylog2] Re: Newbie to graylog2

2014-08-22 Thread Foobar Geez
Thanks! I will be setting up an eval instance of GL2 to get some hands-on. A few questions: - I started reading about logstash and GL2 and it seems both have overlapping functionality. Based on your experience, is there any reason why I should be choosing one over the other? Given this is a

[graylog2] Graylog2 Web Interface Search Oddity

2014-08-22 Thread n00nchiez
Hi, Unsure if this has been mentioned somewhere else before but we are experiencing a minor oddity in the search facility for the Graylog2 Web Interface. We are running Graylog server 0.20.6 and Graylog web 0.20.6 (So the latest version i am aware of) and say we want to search one of our