> -Original Message-
> From: Sven Schreiber
> Sent: Sunday, July 7, 2019 5:36 PM
> > Actually, you got me thinking about the possibility of having a second
> > argiment to I() (aka F_IMAT); in many cases, you want to construct a
> > matrix that is an identity matrix "plus some zeros";
Am 10.07.2019 um 14:10 schrieb Allin Cottrell:
On Mon, 8 Jul 2019, Sven Schreiber wrote:
BTW, I checked the expression "zeros(100,1) * NA" which still has all
zeros. Now I remember some dispute about the desired result for 0*NA,
but in any case the variant "zeros(100,1) .* NA" gives all 'nan',
On Mon, 8 Jul 2019, Sven Schreiber wrote:
> BTW, I checked the expression "zeros(100,1) * NA" which still has all
> zeros. Now I remember some dispute about the desired result for 0*NA,
> but in any case the variant "zeros(100,1) .* NA" gives all 'nan', so I'm
> sure one of the two must be a bug.
