On Mon, 19 Aug 2019, Sven Schreiber wrote:
> Am 14.07.2019 um 22:35 schrieb Allin Cottrell:
> > On Sun, 14 Jul 2019, Sven Schreiber wrote:
>
> > > about the new 'flatten' function: For the case of string arrays I think
> > > it would be good to have some choice about the separator. Currently a
>
Am 14.07.2019 um 22:35 schrieb Allin Cottrell:
On Sun, 14 Jul 2019, Sven Schreiber wrote:
about the new 'flatten' function: For the case of string arrays I think
it would be good to have some choice about the separator. Currently a
newline (\n) is inserted after each string, which is
On Sun, 14 Jul 2019, Sven Schreiber wrote:
Hi,
about the new 'flatten' function: For the case of string arrays I think
it would be good to have some choice about the separator. Currently a
newline (\n) is inserted after each string, which is reasonable.
However, there's an unused argument
Am 14.07.2019 um 18:18 schrieb Sven Schreiber:
This would be useful if the input array actually holds textual
representations of numbers, which can then be processed with sscanf.
OK sorry, just found out that sscanf now (since 2019c) also accepts
string arrays.
Perhaps some more flexibility
