[Gretl-devel] Re: gretl 2019b?

2019-05-09 Thread Jack
On Thu, 9 May 2019, Sven Schreiber wrote: > Am 09.05.2019 um 20:57 schrieb Allin Cottrell: > >> I agree with Sven that some clean-up and enhancement is needed, but I >> suggest we propose that till after the 2019b release. I think what >> might be best, when we get to it, is >> >> * Revert the

[Gretl-devel] Re: gretl 2019b?

2019-05-09 Thread Sven Schreiber
Am 09.05.2019 um 20:57 schrieb Allin Cottrell: > I agree with Sven that some clean-up and enhancement is needed, but I > suggest we propose that till after the 2019b release. I think what > might be best, when we get to it, is > > * Revert the "vif" command to just producing the VIFs (which are

[Gretl-devel] Re: gretl 2019b?

2019-05-09 Thread Jack
On Thu, 9 May 2019, Sven Schreiber wrote: >> IMO the new facility would be especially useful for the commands >> where >> the user writes down her estimator herself (nls, gmm, mle). > > What I'd like to know in the present context, does Lee's bkw package > help you there? That would be an

[Gretl-devel] Re: gretl 2019b?

2019-05-09 Thread Sven Schreiber
Am 09.05.2019 um 08:35 schrieb Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti: > On Wed, 8 May 2019, Sven Schreiber wrote: > >> In March I had sent to this list a (possibly non-exhaustive) list of >> non-working commands with 'vif': >> >> * Doesn't work with vif: >> - nls >> - mle >> ... > > IMO the new facility would

[Gretl-devel] Re: gretl 2019b?

2019-05-09 Thread Allin Cottrell
On Thu, 9 May 2019, Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti wrote: > On Thu, 9 May 2019, Sven Schreiber wrote: > >> Am 09.05.2019 um 20:57 schrieb Allin Cottrell: >> >>> I agree with Sven that some clean-up and enhancement is needed, but I >>> suggest we propose that till after the 2019b release. I think what

[Gretl-devel] Re: gretl 2019b?

2019-05-09 Thread Allin Cottrell
On Thu, 9 May 2019, Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti wrote: > On Thu, 9 May 2019, Sven Schreiber wrote: > > > > IMO the new facility would be especially useful for the commands where > > > the user writes down her estimator herself (nls, gmm, mle). > > > > What I'd like to know in the present context,

[Gretl-devel] Re: gretl 2019b?

2019-05-09 Thread Jack
On Wed, 8 May 2019, Sven Schreiber wrote: > In March I had sent to this list a (possibly non-exhaustive) list of > non-working commands with 'vif': > > * Doesn't work with vif: > - nls > - mle > - garch (presumably also arch) > - midasreg > - gmm > - biprobit > - tsls > - duration (a crash was

[Gretl-devel] Re: gretl 2019b?

2019-05-08 Thread Sven Schreiber
Am 08.05.2019 um 18:13 schrieb Allin Cottrell: > On Wed, 8 May 2019, Lee Adkins wrote: > >> Did I miss something? I take it that the bkw package has been >> "integrated" >> into gretl making it unnecessary? That is fine with me. Is there >> something >> I need to do? This integration has indeed

[Gretl-devel] Re: gretl 2019b?

2019-05-08 Thread Allin Cottrell
On Wed, 8 May 2019, Lee Adkins wrote: > Did I miss something? I take it that the bkw package has been "integrated" > into gretl making it unnecessary? That is fine with me. Is there something > I need to do? I think you're right, Lee. The "vif" command now supports the new $result accessor. As

[Gretl-devel] Re: gretl 2019b?

2019-05-08 Thread Lee Adkins
Did I miss something? I take it that the bkw package has been "integrated" into gretl making it unnecessary? That is fine with me. Is there something I need to do? Lee On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 1:14 AM Sven Schreiber wrote: > Am 08.05.2019 um 01:22 schrieb Allin Cottrell: > > So far as I'm

[Gretl-devel] Re: gretl 2019b?

2019-05-08 Thread Sven Schreiber
Am 08.05.2019 um 01:22 schrieb Allin Cottrell: > So far as I'm concerned we're about ready for the gretl 2019b release. > Does anyone have any bugs they want to report -- or do any developers > have new stuff they'd like to add -- before we do that? Spontaneously I remember the VIF stuff. There