[Gretl-devel] Re: uniq() on NA-vector

2021-07-14 Thread atecon
Am 14.07.2021 15:37 schrieb Allin Cottrell: On Wed, 14 Jul 2021, atecon wrote: Am 14.07.2021 03:34 schrieb Allin Cottrell: > > > > > > matrix m1 = {1, NA; 3, NA} > > matrix m2 = {1, -1; 3, -3} > > > > eval quantile(m2, 0.5) > > eval quantile(m1, 0.5) > > > > ? eval quantile(m2, 0.5) > > 2

[Gretl-devel] Re: uniq() on NA-vector

2021-07-14 Thread Allin Cottrell
On Wed, 14 Jul 2021, atecon wrote: > Am 14.07.2021 03:34 schrieb Allin Cottrell: > > > > > > > > > matrix m1 = {1, NA; 3, NA} > > > matrix m2 = {1, -1; 3, -3} > > > > > > eval quantile(m2, 0.5) > > > eval quantile(m1, 0.5) > > > > > > ? eval quantile(m2, 0.5) > > > 2 -2 > > > > > > ? eval qua

[Gretl-devel] Re: uniq() on NA-vector

2021-07-13 Thread atecon
Am 14.07.2021 03:34 schrieb Allin Cottrell: On Tue, 13 Jul 2021, atecon wrote: Am 13.07.2021 10:40 schrieb Sven Schreiber: Am 13.07.2021 um 09:39 schrieb atecon: matrix m = {NA; NA} eval uniq(m) ? eval uniq(m) Data error The doc is silent about the case when all entries of the column are

[Gretl-devel] Re: uniq() on NA-vector

2021-07-13 Thread Allin Cottrell
On Tue, 13 Jul 2021, atecon wrote: Am 13.07.2021 10:40 schrieb Sven Schreiber: Am 13.07.2021 um 09:39 schrieb atecon: matrix m = {NA; NA} eval uniq(m) ? eval uniq(m) Data error The doc is silent about the case when all entries of the column are NA. I am a bit surprised that this leads to

[Gretl-devel] Re: uniq() on NA-vector

2021-07-13 Thread atecon
Am 13.07.2021 10:40 schrieb Sven Schreiber: Am 13.07.2021 um 09:39 schrieb atecon: matrix m = {NA; NA} eval uniq(m) ? eval uniq(m) Data error The doc is silent about the case when all entries of the column are NA. I am a bit surprised that this leads to a data error and hence full stop. W

[Gretl-devel] Re: uniq() on NA-vector

2021-07-13 Thread Sven Schreiber
Am 13.07.2021 um 09:39 schrieb atecon: matrix m = {NA; NA} eval uniq(m) ? eval uniq(m) Data error The doc is silent about the case when all entries of the column are NA. I am a bit surprised that this leads to a data error and hence full stop. What about returning an empty matrix in this cas