On Fri, Dec 14, 2007, Michael Kerpan wrote:
...that groff/troff seems to be written off by so many as obsolete
and only useful for man pages, despite the fact that it can do
everything that TeX/LaTeX (seemingly the favored non-WYSIWYG document
processor) can do but while taking up 3 megabytes
On 15/12/07 04:25:40, Michael Kerpan wrote:
...that groff/troff seems to be written
off by so many as obsolete ...
IMO it is all a matter of perceptions. People think that a 30 year old
application that, even today, does not have a GUI **must** be obsolete.
Add to this, *roff does not conform
On 14-Dec-07 17:25:40, Michael Kerpan wrote:
...that groff/troff seems to be written off by so many as
obsolete and only useful for man pages, despite the
fact that it can do everything that TeX/LaTeX (seemingly
the favored non-WYSIWYG document processor) can do but
while taking up 3
On Dec 15, 2007 1:25 AM, Michael Kerpan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...that groff/troff seems to be written off by so many as obsolete
and only useful for man pages, despite the fact that it can do
everything that TeX/LaTeX (seemingly the favored non-WYSIWYG document
processor) can do but while
