[bug #59442] [PATCH] groff.cpp: move soelim before preconv in constructed pipeline

Follow-up Comment #11, bug #59442 (group groff): It sounds like a decision is needed on which is the cart and which the horse. Should this bug take priority -- as comment #1 points out, "The whole point of soelim is to get preprocessors to run on `.so`ed files" -- and then bug #65108 has to

[bug #64155] [troff] specifying -fZD on command line generates warnings

Follow-up Comment #38, bug #64155 (group groff): [https://savannah.nongnu.org/support/?111059 Frustration submitted.] ___ Reply to this item at: ___

[bug #64155] [troff] specifying -fZD on command line generates warnings

Follow-up Comment #37, bug #64155 (group groff): [comment #34 comment #34:] > Maybe it is time for a proper string equality operator in our > conditional expressions. While that would be a useful addition to the language, equivalent functionality can be achieved in user space, in a way back

[bug #64155] [troff] specifying -fZD on command line generates warnings

Follow-up Comment #36, bug #64155 (group groff): Sigh. Wrote a long comment. Form was stale. Document Expired. Text lost. ___ Reply to this item at:

font families in GNU troff (was: Changing header/footer font in mm)

Hi Thomas, Sorry for the delay in getting back to this. At 2024-04-24T10:23:19+0200, Thomas Dupond via wrote: [...] > >> > At 2024-04-21T23:52:48-0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote: > >> > > For mm, what I would do is set up the mounting positions to > >> > > replace Times with Helvetica. > >> > >

[bug #44714] compatibility mode: .do request and macro expansion via \* collide

Follow-up Comment #4, bug #44714 (group groff): [comment #3 comment #3:] > Probably until this is fixed (which may be a while if it proves as > intractable as Werner predicts), the andoc.tmac comment should cite > this ticket rather than vaguely referring to "a bug in GNU troff." This is now

[bug #62826] [tmac] clearly comment bug #44714 workaround in andoc.tmac

Update of bug #62826 (group groff): Severity: 3 - Normal => 2 - Minor Status: Need Info => None Summary: [PATCH] [tmac] options "-mandoc" and '-C' are not compatible => [tmac] clearly

[bug #65692] tmac/mdoc.tmac: fix minor differences from the "mandoc" software

URL: Summary: tmac/mdoc.tmac: fix minor differences from the "mandoc" software Group: GNU roff Submitter: bjarniig Submitted: Sun 05 May 2024 10:59:36 PM UTC Category: Macro

[bug #62826] [PATCH] [tmac] options "-mandoc" and '-C' are not compatible

Follow-up Comment #5, bug #62826 (group groff): I do not have a case example as I use stripping (expanded 'tmac/strip.sed') to avoid the repeated removal of non-essential characters. Example is file 'tmac/doc.tmac'. Size 162336 mar 27 12:39 tmac/doc.tmac Stripped size 90253 maí 5

Re: Proposed v2: revised man(7) synopsis macros

Hi Branden, On Sun, May 05, 2024 at 04:11:21PM +0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > On Sun, May 05, 2024 at 08:54:53AM -0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote: > > Hi Alex, > > Hi Branden, > > > At 2024-05-05T14:41:44+0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > > > Thanks! > > > > > > I'm trying it already in

Re: Proposed v2: revised man(7) synopsis macros

At 2024-05-05T16:28:23+0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > You did s/vger/lore/ and now the mail is bouncing. :-) Whoops. The version of neomutt I'm using has an annoying problem; it won't let me group reply to tagged messages. I haven't looked into why. neomutt has other annoying bugs, like

Re: Proposed v2: revised man(7) synopsis macros

You did s/vger/lore/ and now the mail is bouncing. :-) -- signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Proposed v2: revised man(7) synopsis macros

On Sun, May 05, 2024 at 08:54:53AM -0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote: > Hi Alex, Hi Branden, > At 2024-05-05T14:41:44+0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > > Thanks! > > > > I'm trying it already in liba2i, since it's a project that I don't > > expect to use until 1.24.0 is out. > > Thanks for

Re: Proposed v2: revised man(7) synopsis macros

Hi Alex, At 2024-05-05T14:41:44+0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > Thanks! > > I'm trying it already in liba2i, since it's a project that I don't > expect to use until 1.24.0 is out. Thanks for giving it some field testing. groff's own man pages aren't the best test bed because I've revised

Re: Proposed v2: revised man(7) synopsis macros

On Sun, May 05, 2024 at 02:41:44PM +0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > Hi Branden, > > On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 03:31:26PM -0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote: > > At 2024-04-26T11:32:06+0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > > > > My questions: > > > > > > > > A. Does anyone object to me committing this

Re: Proposed v2: revised man(7) synopsis macros

Hi Branden, On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 03:31:26PM -0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote: > At 2024-04-26T11:32:06+0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > > > My questions: > > > > > > A. Does anyone object to me committing this change to groff's > > > master branch? It will of course require a NEWS item,