Re: [Groff] Suggested tbl enhancement

2006-05-24 Thread Werner LEMBERG
With tbl? Interesting. Please give an example. From p.218 of their book: Thanks. Well, this isn't what I would call `nested tables', because they are defined serially. hdtbl really supports nesting like this: .TBL cols=2 . TR .TD . nop 1*1 .TD . nop 1*2

Re: [Groff] Suggested tbl enhancement

2006-05-22 Thread Gaius Mulley
Werner LEMBERG [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hmm, can you post a TODO, please? 1 HTML support (would probably require changes to the groff wrapper to pass a command-line option to tbl for -Thtml) It seems that the hdtbl macros are much easier to adapt to generate proper HTML. BTW, I've

Re: [Groff] Suggested tbl enhancement

2006-05-22 Thread Werner LEMBERG
McGlinton McNabb in Typesetting Tables on the Unix System give examples of nested tables using diversions :-) With tbl? Interesting. Please give an example. Werner ___ Groff mailing list Groff@gnu.org

Re: [Groff] Suggested tbl enhancement

2006-05-22 Thread Robert Thorsby
On 2006.05.22 14:46 Werner LEMBERG wrote: McGlinton McNabb in Typesetting Tables on the Unix System give examples of nested tables using diversions :-) With tbl? Interesting. Please give an example. From p.218 of their book: .br .di d1 .in 0 .TS cp-2 s lp-3 cp-3 lp-3 cp-3 . = TEA

Re: [Groff] Suggested tbl enhancement

2006-05-21 Thread Robert Thorsby
On 2006.05.22 06:07 Werner LEMBERG wrote: BTW, hdtbl supports nested tables, something not possible with tbl. I think I am walking where angels fear to tread. McGlinton McNabb in Typesetting Tables on the Unix System give examples of nested tables using diversions :-) It seems to me that,

Re: [Groff] Suggested tbl enhancement

2006-05-15 Thread T. Kurt Bond
Here's an example of the existing expand option: .\ groff -Tascii -ms -t tbl-ex.ms .LP This is an example table. .TS allbox, tab(#), expand; C C L. 42#23#T{ This is a paragraph in a table. Hopefully it will be long enough to serve as a useful example. T}

Re: [Groff] Suggested tbl enhancement

2006-05-12 Thread Gaius Mulley
Larry Kollar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Werner LEMBERG wrote: It sounds like a good idea, but there are so many potential enhancements that would make tbl easier to live with that it's almost worth a rewrite. Hmm, can you post a TODO, please? My short list is primarily

Re: [Groff] Suggested tbl enhancement

2006-05-12 Thread T. Kurt Bond
I've always wanted a tbl column modifier that indicated that the table should be extended to the current document column width and any extra width allocated to the modified tbl column. This would make it easy to have tables as wide as a document column with one tbl column as wide as possible for

Re: [Groff] Suggested tbl enhancement

2006-05-04 Thread Werner LEMBERG
Anyway, it's kind of surprising that there's no pointsize global option for tables. Do we really need this? I guess the typical workaround is to bracket the table with .ps requests. Yes, maybe something like this (untested): .ds table-size 14.4 .am TS . ds orig-ev \\n[.ev]\ .

Re: [Groff] Suggested tbl enhancement

2006-05-04 Thread Werner LEMBERG
It sounds like a good idea, but there are so many potential enhancements that would make tbl easier to live with that it's almost worth a rewrite. Hmm, can you post a TODO, please? Additionally, I ask you to further test Joachim's `HDtbl' package ftp://ftp.uni-heidelberg.de/pub/HDtbl/0.91

Re: Re: [Groff] Suggested tbl enhancement

2006-05-04 Thread Larry Kollar
Werner LEMBERG wrote: It sounds like a good idea, but there are so many potential enhancements that would make tbl easier to live with that it's almost worth a rewrite. Hmm, can you post a TODO, please? My short list is primarily cosmetic (the goal is to require a minimal amount of