Re: [groff] mom date string

2019-07-08 Thread Greg 'groggy' Lehey
On Tuesday, 9 July 2019 at 4:30:56 +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote: > Hi Kirill, > > Kirill S Sapelkin wrote on Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 07:19:17PM -0700: > >> Just started using groff and mom (had been using LaTeX) for letters so far. >> So far it seems elegant. >> >> Could not find a way to

Re: [groff] mom date string

2019-07-08 Thread Robert Thorsby
On 09/07/19 12:30:56, Ingo Schwarze wrote: Kirill S Sapelkin wrote on Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 07:19:17PM -0700: > Could not find a way to automaticaly insert the date at compile time other than: > > .DATE > .sy date '+%e %B %Y' > dater > .so dater > .sy rm dater Logically, inserting the date

Re: [groff] mom date string

2019-07-08 Thread Damian McGuckin
On Tue, 9 Jul 2019, Ingo Schwarze wrote: Logically, inserting the date at compile time doesn't really make sense. You don't want the date of compiling there, you want the date the letter was written and originally sent. So there is really value in having the author enter the date manually.

Re: [groff] mom date string

2019-07-08 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi Kirill, Kirill S Sapelkin wrote on Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 07:19:17PM -0700: > Just started using groff and mom (had been using LaTeX) for letters so far. > So far it seems elegant. > > Could not find a way to automaticaly insert the date at compile time > other than: > > .DATE > .sy date '+%e

[groff] mom date string

2019-07-08 Thread Kirill S Sapelkin
Hello, Just started using groff and mom (had been using LaTeX) for letters so far. So far it seems elegant. Could not find a way to automaticaly insert the date at compile time other than: .DATE .sy date '+%e %B %Y' > dater .so dater .sy rm dater This seems to require the -U (unsafe) option