Werner LEMBERG [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
you've replaced `cdot' with \(md in eqn -- why not replacing `...'
with three \(md characters too?
Looking at the Guide to Eqn, I see they do that. OK, I'll patch it in.
Done.
--
a href=http://www.catb.org/~esr/;Eric S. Raymond/a
you've replaced `cdot' with \(md in eqn -- why not replacing
`...' with three \(md characters too?
Don't! I want to have the normal ellipsis on the baseline.
(Like in 1, 2, ...; for special cases it's preferable to have
a separate cdots operator with three \(md characters.)
Tadziu Hoffmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
you've replaced `cdot' with \(md in eqn -- why not replacing
`...' with three \(md characters too?
Don't! I want to have the normal ellipsis on the baseline.
(Like in 1, 2, ...; for special cases it's preferable to have
a separate cdots operator with
On 05-Feb-07 Tadziu Hoffmann wrote:
you've replaced `cdot' with \(md in eqn -- why not replacing
`...' with three \(md characters too?
Don't! I want to have the normal ellipsis on the baseline.
(Like in 1, 2, ...; for special cases it's preferable to have
a separate cdots operator with
Ted Harding [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
How can we find out what precisely, and so far, has been done
to groff and its components (tbl, eqn, pic, .. ) in the name
of the man-page upgrade, and what the effects of this are likely
to be on non-man-page usage? And what is likely to be next in
the
Werner LEMBERG [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Given the many user objections I suggest that we revert the default of
`...'; additionally I like the idea of introducing a `cdots'
operator. Eric, can you work on this?
It's done, ChangeLog entry and all. Utterly trivial, I just added one
macro definition
Werner LEMBERG [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You are doing this at an incredible fast pace! Checking your changes,
I find a lot of small typos. May I suggest that you re-read the diffs
after they have been sent to the groff-cvs list? This is what I do to
catch my typos ...
I'll do that.
--
