Re: Vim syntax highlighting for *roff (was: Bug#1019257: ...)

At the risk of starting an editor skirmish. ;-) * On 2022 06 Sep 15:05 -0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote: > > I didn't _finish_ to my satisfaction--I ran into some kind of problems > involving the boundaries of the highlighting vs. the boundaries of the > lexical matching, which made some nested

Re: Vim syntax highlighting for *roff (was: Bug#1019257: ...)

Hi Alex, At 2022-09-06T22:21:39+0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > On 9/6/22 22:01, G. Branden Robinson wrote: > > And, for grins, my "git log -p" is also attached in case anyone would > > find that edifying. > > Do you have the git repo in a public remote that I can check out? Sorry, no--it just

Re: Vim syntax highlighting for *roff (was: Bug#1019257: ...)

Hi Branden, On 9/6/22 22:01, G. Branden Robinson wrote: > And, for grins, my "git log -p" is also attached in case anyone would > find that edifying. Do you have the git repo in a public remote that I can check out? Cheers, Alex -- OpenPGP_signature

Vim syntax highlighting for *roff (was: Bug#1019257: ...)

I guess this is as good a time as any to share the Vim syntax highlighting rules I use, which I rewrote from the ground up, and last worked on about a year ago. I undertook this because I found the stock Vim one, with Pedro Alejandro López-Valencia's and Jérôme Plût's names on it, difficult to