On 29-Mar-05 Ted Harding wrote:
On 29-Mar-05 Otavio Exel wrote:
[...]
I'm using -me and groff 1.17.2 (debian stable);
I'll make a suggestion. This uses the 'ms' macros (which
I'm more familiar with than 'me' so I know what I'm doing!).
[...]
Now that I've had a detailed look at the 'me'
Tadziu Hoffmann wrote:
This is actually nontrivial. Groff handles split join (.fi) and
nosplit nojoin (.nf), but not split nojoin -- at least not by
itself,
:-O
so we have to help it along a bit. Here is a somewhat crude method
which has the disadvantage that you have to precede every
Here it is, independent of the macro package.
Werner
==
.\ break -- no join
.de BNJ
. nr BNJ-dobreak 1
. it 1 BNJ-break
..
.
.de /BNJ
. nr BNJ-dobreak 0
..
.
.de BNJ-break
. if \\n[BNJ-dobreak] \{\
.
On Wed Mar 30 13:09:40 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 10:47:43PM +0200, Jorgen Grahn wrote:
...
Well, if one interprets what Otavio says as requests and macro
calls must be at the start of lines, it makes sense to me. It
.I is
a bit hard to swallow, if you come
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 12:23:32AM +0200, Jorgen Grahn wrote:
On Wed Mar 30 13:09:40 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Coming from a version control background I happen to love the roff requests
because they have a natural tendency to break things up. When people
create really long lines and
