Re: [Groff] Next release - maintainership

Bertrand -- On Wed, Sep 27, 2017, Bertrand Garrigues wrote: > OK then I volunteer to be a maintainer. As said previously I won't be > able to address all the problems submitted on the list, but I can still > take in charge part of the work. I, for one, welcome your taking on the role of

Re: [Groff] Next release - maintainership

Hi Ted, On Sat, Sep 16 2017 at 08:43:05 PM, Ted Harding wrote: > So my suggestion would be that someone who knows their way > around the organisation of gnu.oeg (and I find it confusing!) > should undertake the task of establishing a real maintainer. > This might

Re: [Groff] pic.ps

On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 11:43:40AM -0400, Doug McIlroy wrote: > The Fedora system I have access to lacks /usr/share/doc/groff, and > in particular the wonderful tutorial /usr/share/doc/groff/pic.ps. On Debian 8 locate pic.ps returns /usr/share/doc/groff-base/pic.ps.gz -- Mike

Re: [Groff] pic.ps

On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 11:43:40 -0400, in message 201709271543.v8rfhebu128...@tahoe.cs.dartmouth.edu, Doug McIlroy wrote: > The Fedora system I have access to lacks /usr/share/doc/groff, and > in particular the wonderful tutorial /usr/share/doc/groff/pic.ps. > Was that omitted from groff 1.22.3, or

Re: [Groff] pic.ps

On Wed, Sep 27, 2017, Doug McIlroy wrote: > The Fedora system I have access to lacks /usr/share/doc/groff, and > in particular the wonderful tutorial /usr/share/doc/groff/pic.ps. > Was that omitted from groff 1.22.3, or did it get dropped somewhere > in the chain of custody between there and here?

[Groff] pic.ps

The Fedora system I have access to lacks /usr/share/doc/groff, and in particular the wonderful tutorial /usr/share/doc/groff/pic.ps. Was that omitted from groff 1.22.3, or did it get dropped somewhere in the chain of custody between there and here? Another bit of evidence: in a cygwin