Re: [Groff] XXX Funny movie

2007-01-27 Thread Ted Harding
On 27-Jan-07 Werner LEMBERG wrote: The problem we are seeing is that after all the parts have been removed, there is still a non-empty signature text piece left ... so the message is not discarded. BUT ... that signature is added by mailman itself! I've now removed the mailing list

Re: [Groff] XXX Funny movie

2007-01-26 Thread Gunnar Ritter
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 This filtering component is stupid. Why doesn't it discard a message after it has deleted all content anyway? Gunnar ___ Groff mailing list Groff@gnu.org

Re: [Groff] XXX Funny movie

2007-01-26 Thread Ted Harding
On 26-Jan-07 Gunnar Ritter wrote: X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 This filtering component is stupid. Why doesn't it discard a message after it has deleted all content anyway? I'm sorely tempted to agree with this! My blood-pressure (normally healthily low) has been rising

Re: [Groff] XXX Funny movie

2007-01-26 Thread Werner LEMBERG
This filtering component is stupid. Why doesn't it discard a message after it has deleted all content anyway? Good question. Most of the spam is automatically deleted, but some of them apparently not. I'm very bad in managing lists -- maybe there is something I can do on my side, but I don't

Re: [Groff] XXX Funny movie

2007-01-26 Thread Nick Stoughton
On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 23:05 +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote: This filtering component is stupid. Why doesn't it discard a message after it has deleted all content anyway? Good question. Most of the spam is automatically deleted, but some of them apparently not. I'm very bad in managing lists

Re: [Groff] XXX Funny movie

2007-01-26 Thread Werner LEMBERG
The problem we are seeing is that after all the parts have been removed, there is still a non-empty signature text piece left ... so the message is not discarded. BUT ... that signature is added by mailman itself! I've now removed the mailing list footer. Thanks for your help -- I would