On 27-Jan-07 Werner LEMBERG wrote:
The problem we are seeing is that after all the parts have been
removed, there is still a non-empty signature text piece left ... so
the message is not discarded. BUT ... that signature is added by
mailman itself!
I've now removed the mailing list
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5
This filtering component is stupid. Why doesn't it discard
a message after it has deleted all content anyway?
Gunnar
___
Groff mailing list
Groff@gnu.org
On 26-Jan-07 Gunnar Ritter wrote:
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5
This filtering component is stupid. Why doesn't it discard
a message after it has deleted all content anyway?
I'm sorely tempted to agree with this!
My blood-pressure (normally healthily low) has been rising
This filtering component is stupid. Why doesn't it discard
a message after it has deleted all content anyway?
Good question. Most of the spam is automatically deleted, but some of
them apparently not. I'm very bad in managing lists -- maybe there is
something I can do on my side, but I don't
On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 23:05 +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
This filtering component is stupid. Why doesn't it discard
a message after it has deleted all content anyway?
Good question. Most of the spam is automatically deleted, but some of
them apparently not. I'm very bad in managing lists
The problem we are seeing is that after all the parts have been
removed, there is still a non-empty signature text piece left ... so
the message is not discarded. BUT ... that signature is added by
mailman itself!
I've now removed the mailing list footer. Thanks for your help -- I
would