Re: [Groff] Next release - maintainership

2017-11-08 Thread Peter Schaffter
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017, Gour wrote: > On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 19:02:48 -0400 > Peter Schaffter wrote: > > Hello Peter, > > I have visited your site and I'm thrilled with the beauty of your documents > produced with groff/mom and must admit that mom is the primary reason I'm >

Re: [Groff] Next release - maintainership

2017-11-08 Thread Gour
On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 19:02:48 -0400 Peter Schaffter wrote: Hello Peter, I have visited your site and I'm thrilled with the beauty of your documents produced with groff/mom and must admit that mom is the primary reason I'm looking whether groff/mom can eliminate my need to

Re: [Groff] Next release - maintainership

2017-09-27 Thread Peter Schaffter
Bertrand -- On Wed, Sep 27, 2017, Bertrand Garrigues wrote: > OK then I volunteer to be a maintainer. As said previously I won't be > able to address all the problems submitted on the list, but I can still > take in charge part of the work. I, for one, welcome your taking on the role of

Re: [Groff] Next release - maintainership

2017-09-27 Thread Bertrand Garrigues
Hi Ted, On Sat, Sep 16 2017 at 08:43:05 PM, Ted Harding wrote: > So my suggestion would be that someone who knows their way > around the organisation of gnu.oeg (and I find it confusing!) > should undertake the task of establishing a real maintainer. > This might

Re: [Groff] Next release - maintainership

2017-09-16 Thread Ted Harding
[See in-line below] On Sat, 2017-09-16 at 21:11 +0200, Bertrand Garrigues wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm currently preparing the next release of groff (I still have to > commit a few changes in the build system but I'm not far from making a > candidate package). In order to upload a tarball (into