I am trying to compare the stability of a protein from two organisms which live
in the aforesaid temperature. I am wondering it would make sense to run MD
simulation in gromacs with Amber99sb in these temperature since force field
parameterization was carried out in room temperature.
I am
Hi GMX-users,
I have been having issues with plot_hbmap.pl because the output it included has
none of the residues I am suggesting it to find. I get my hbmap.xpm file by
using g_hbond and picking the ligand group first only to receive this output
after running perl:
# DonorAcceptor %
Hi,
What you need to be aware of is that heat capacities aren't well reflected by
the force field, hence the temperature offset from 300 K may not be well
reflected either. As such, your simulation at 323 K may in fact be more
representative of let's say 335 K or something. I can't comment on
On 5/8/14, 2:48 AM, Pappu Kumar wrote:
I am trying to compare the stability of a protein from two organisms which live
in the aforesaid temperature. I am wondering it would make sense to run MD
simulation in gromacs with Amber99sb in these temperature since force field
parameterization was
On 5/8/14, 5:14 AM, Jacob Babinec wrote:
Hi GMX-users,
I have been having issues with plot_hbmap.pl because the output it included has
none of the residues I am suggesting it to find. I get my hbmap.xpm file by
using g_hbond and picking the ligand group first only to receive this output
On 5/8/14, 1:06 AM, Sanchaita Rajkhowa wrote:
Dear all,
I would like to know if automated topology builder and repository
server
http://compbio.biosci.uq.edu.au/atb/index.py?tab=existing_tabnocache=836
gives the correct topology for ligands? For e.g. I have to build
topology for
Dear all
When doing membrane simulation, do protein needs to be prepared in Xleap
module in Amber as given in tutorials (Bevans Lab).
regards
--
B.Suriyanarayanan
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
Thank you Justin for quick reply. I did exactly what you have mentioned but
the thing is I am getting number of hydrogen bonds per monomer higher than
what i was expecting. Is it possible to see which polymer atom have the
hydrogen bond.( I mean is there a way to see specific atoms using the
On 5/8/14, 11:21 AM, Udaya Dahal wrote:
Thank you Justin for quick reply. I did exactly what you have mentioned but
the thing is I am getting number of hydrogen bonds per monomer higher than
what i was expecting. Is it possible to see which polymer atom have the
hydrogen bond.( I mean is
Hi,
Check out g_hbond -h... documentation is written for a reason ;-) You sound
like you want to see the existence matrix. You might want to create some
index groups for small parts of your polymer, unless you want to drown
while interpreting -hbn and -hbm.
Mark
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 5:21 PM,
By modifying nstlist, you're very likely fixing a symptom, rather than
fixing the problem.
Mark
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Natalia Alveal F. nalv...@bio.puc.clwrote:
Dear Gromacs users,
Reducing the nstlist value works for me.
Thanks a lot for yours suggestions.
2014-05-06 22:47
Dear gromacs users
Can somebody tell me how to calculate the RMSD of the peptide conformation
relative to the NMR structure?
Best wishes
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
* Can't post? Read
Dear friends
who knows about force field choosing in zinc ion complex with amyloid beta
peptide protein???
i,m looking forward to your reply
thank you
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
*
Dear all,
I'm trying to determine the binding energy of a membrane protein to the
membrane. Ultimately I need to compare the binding energy of the same
protein to two similar types of lipid, the hypothesis being that there
should be a slight difference.
I considered two options: alchemical
On 5/8/14, 2:48 PM, elham tazikeh wrote:
Dear friends
who knows about force field choosing in zinc ion complex with amyloid beta
peptide protein???
What does you survey of the literature suggest? The force field choice is one
of, if not the single most important choices you will make in
On 5/8/14, 3:38 PM, Victor Sojo wrote:
Dear all,
I'm trying to determine the binding energy of a membrane protein to the
membrane. Ultimately I need to compare the binding energy of the same
protein to two similar types of lipid, the hypothesis being that there
should be a slight difference.
Hello all,
I am looking to use GROMACS to simulate carbohydrate-protein systems, and
I'm interested in hearing if anyone has any experience with this, or if
there any cautions or caveats I should be aware of.
Best,
Tamir Dingjan
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
Dear Justin
thanks for your quick reply
i,mgoing to simulate zinc ion on Amyloid beta peptide at 300k...and i
choose 1ZE9 as pdb
my choice is correct or i have to pdb of protein without cation for my
work or can i delete zinc ion effect in that pdb?
for force field choosing ,i think Opls is
18 matches
Mail list logo