[gmx-users] same input tpr same results?

2014-10-13 Thread Albert
Hello: I've generate a .tpr file in my local machine and I am going to submit it to different cluster. I am just wondering, will the trajectory exactly the same? thank you very much albert -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search the archive at

Re: [gmx-users] asking for suggestings on conserved energy calcualtion in NVT when using V-rescale thermostat

2014-10-13 Thread 执念
Dear peers, If I understand correctly, I can get the H-tide from the H (convered En.). What I need to do is get the time intergration of dK (eq. 7 in jcp 2007), which is the auxiliary dynamics. But it not in a standard output. How can I get it ? Can anyone help me ? Many thanks! wade --

[gmx-users] Redirecting trajectories from one gmx module to another

2014-10-13 Thread Machtens, Jan-Philipp
Hi, I would like to redirect gromacs trajectories from one gmx module to another, e.g. using a shell pipe... For example, analyzing a trajectory which is split into two files could be done using gmx trjcat -f traj.part1.xtc traj.part2.xtc -o traj.cat.xtc gmx whatever -f traj.cat.xtc -o result I

[gmx-users] Distance Restraints set for water-ion cluster in gas phase (vacuum)

2014-10-13 Thread liuyong_1...@dicp.ac.cn
Dear gromacs usres, I want to run nvt simulation of water-ion cluster (Na+(H2O)250) in gas phase (vacuum) at higher temperature ( bigger than 200 K). But the cluster will collapse at high temperature. So the distance restraints is used to restraint the water molecules and the ion Na+ not to

Re: [gmx-users] Performance degradation for Verlet cutoff-scheme compared to group

2014-10-13 Thread Олег Титов
Thanks for you reply. On a different machine I've recompiled GROMACS with icc version 13.1.0 (gcc version 4.4.6 compatibility). cmake command: I_MPI_CC=nvcc CC=icc CXX=icpc cmake ../gromacs-src -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=~/gromacs-5.0.2/ -DGMX_FFT_LIBRARY=MKL -DGMX_MPI=OFF -DGMX_GPU=OFF

Re: [gmx-users] Performance degradation for Verlet cutoff-scheme compared to group

2014-10-13 Thread Mark Abraham
Hi, Very likely that simulation is too small to make good use of that many cores (though if there's hyper-threading going on, then there may only be 8 real cores, and you may do better with hyper-threading off...). Gromacs use of OpenMP does not do very well with lots of threads and few atoms. If

Re: [gmx-users] same input tpr same results?

2014-10-13 Thread Mark Abraham
No. http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Terminology/Reproducibility Mark On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Albert mailmd2...@gmail.com wrote: Hello: I've generate a .tpr file in my local machine and I am going to submit it to different cluster. I am just wondering, will the trajectory

Re: [gmx-users] Redirecting trajectories from one gmx module to another

2014-10-13 Thread Mark Abraham
Hi, Unfortunately, Gromacs file handling wasn't designed with pipes in mind. In particular, we often open a file, read its header to get some information, and then go back and read the file again, which doesn't work well with using pipes (see http://redmine.gromacs.org/issues/1489 for details).

Re: [gmx-users] Performance degradation for Verlet cutoff-scheme compared to group

2014-10-13 Thread Dr. Vitaly Chaban
What about trying a larger system, ~10,000 interaction centers? The performance which you report is much below natural expectations for GROMACS. Dr. Vitaly V. Chaban Виталий Витальевич ЧАБАН On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Олег Титов tito...@qsar.chem.msu.ru wrote: Thanks for you reply.

Re: [gmx-users] Regarding umbrella samplling

2014-10-13 Thread Johnny Lu
Hi. Does that mean the umbrella don't overlap enough at those z ? Can you make an overlay plot of the histograms of each umbrella? On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Sathish Kumar sathishk...@gmail.com wrote: Dear gromacs usres, I have run the umbrella sampling with the help of tutorial of

Re: [gmx-users] Regarding umbrella samplling

2014-10-13 Thread Dr. Vitaly Chaban
Yes, it means what you say. I would decrease the number of bins. Dr. Vitaly V. Chaban Виталий Витальевич ЧАБАН On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Johnny Lu johnny.lu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi. Does that mean the umbrella don't overlap enough at those z ? Can you make an overlay plot of the

Re: [gmx-users] Distance Restraints set for water-ion cluster in gas phase (vacuum)

2014-10-13 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 10/13/14 4:48 AM, liuyong_1...@dicp.ac.cn wrote: Dear gromacs usres, I want to run nvt simulation of water-ion cluster (Na+(H2O)250) in gas phase (vacuum) at higher temperature ( bigger than 200 K). But the cluster will collapse at high temperature. So the distance restraints is used to

Re: [gmx-users] Fatal error: Atom O in residue BTC 1 not found in rtp entry with 156 atoms while sorting atoms

2014-10-13 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 10/13/14 8:17 AM, Nilesh Dhumal wrote: Hello, I am getting a following error for pdb2gmx. Fatal error: Atom O in residue BTC 1 not found in rtp entry with 156 atoms while sorting atoms Could anyone tell whats going wrong? Atoms named O1 or O2 get translated per

Re: [gmx-users] TPI calculation in desired coordinates

2014-10-13 Thread Kim Q Hwan
OK, I think I get the right chemical potential. Thank you for answer. Regards, QHwan -- Kim Q Hwan Center of Nano-Liquid Department of Physics Astronomy Seoul National University Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig) On 2014년 10월 9일 Thursday at 오전 2:55, João M. Damas

Re: [gmx-users] Use NVT to mimic NVE

2014-10-13 Thread Johnny Lu
On page 014101-3, the Bussi paper (http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2408420) mentioned: On the other hand, for coupling constant approaching infinity,the Hamiltonian dynamics is recovered. Does that means that for a large enough coupling constant, the velocities are nearly not rescaled, and the

Re: [gmx-users] Use NVT to mimic NVE

2014-10-13 Thread Michael Shirts
I guess, if I pick a coupling constant that is just small enough to keep the energy conserved, I would get a NVT simulation that is as close as a NVE simulation as possible. Is this correct? Yes, but then at that point the thermostat isn't actually thermostatting. The Bussi comment is merely

Re: [gmx-users] Performance degradation for Verlet cutoff-scheme compared to group

2014-10-13 Thread Олег Титов
Good day, Here is the .log file https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B3p_uIrSkPysS2kweC1QWUVfaTA Regards Oleg Titov 2014-10-13 13:31 GMT+04:00 Mark Abraham mark.j.abra...@gmail.com: Hi, Very likely that simulation is too small to make good use of that many cores (though if there's

Re: [gmx-users] Regarding umbrella samplling

2014-10-13 Thread Sathish Kumar
Hai Yes, I have ploted the histogram, all windows are merged..please check this histo.jpg file attached to the below link. https://www.dropbox.com/s/ndl0w250dnawmib/histogram.jpg?dl=0 On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 3:47 AM, Johnny Lu johnny.lu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi. Does that mean the

Re: [gmx-users] Regarding umbrella samplling

2014-10-13 Thread Sathish Kumar
I am not able to find wheather the windows are overlaped or not. Please help me in this. Thanks. On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Sathish Kumar sathishk...@gmail.com wrote: Hai Yes, I have ploted the histogram, all windows are merged..please check this histo.jpg file attached to the

Re: [gmx-users] Regarding umbrella samplling

2014-10-13 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 10/13/14 1:08 PM, Sathish Kumar wrote: I am not able to find wheather the windows are overlaped or not. Please help me in this. You've got a gap in the sampling exactly where g_wham tells you. The histograms show this. You either need more windows or a different force constant, or

Re: [gmx-users] Regarding umbrella samplling

2014-10-13 Thread Sathish Kumar
Hai I have decreased the number of bins=50 and i have not get the previously mentioned warnings. Still, the profile.xvg is looking like below 2.148184e+000.00e+00 2.300988e+000.00e+00 2.453792e+000.00e+00 2.606596e+000.00e+00 2.759400e+000.00e+00

Re: [gmx-users] Performance degradation for Verlet cutoff-scheme compared to group

2014-10-13 Thread Szilárd Páll
Hi, As the log file points out, you picked a combinations of settings that do not have corresponding optimized non-bonded kernels: LJ-PME with Lorentz-Berthelot is not supported with SIMD kernels, falling back to plain-C kernels Using plain C 4x4 non-bonded kernels WARNING: Using the slow

Re: [gmx-users] Use NVT to mimic NVE

2014-10-13 Thread Johnny Lu
I just want something that will patch up the energy lost due to numerical error of NVE simulation of the system ran by mixed precision gromacs, instead of a thermostat. I hope the velocity rescaling is sufficiently uncorrelated with the motion of the protein. So far, the simulations ran 2.5 ns,

Re: [gmx-users] Use NVT to mimic NVE

2014-10-13 Thread Johnny Lu
The simulation get worse in a new way. I see that thermostat scales velocity and may not fix numerical error in potential energy. On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Johnny Lu johnny.lu...@gmail.com wrote: I just want something that will patch up the energy lost due to numerical error of NVE

Re: [gmx-users] Performance degradation for Verlet cutoff-scheme compared to group

2014-10-13 Thread Олег Титов
Thank you, Szilárd, for this list of options! 2014-10-13 22:00 GMT+04:00 Szilárd Páll pall.szil...@gmail.com: Hi, As the log file points out, you picked a combinations of settings that do not have corresponding optimized non-bonded kernels: LJ-PME with Lorentz-Berthelot is not supported

[gmx-users] Error on gromacs running: Attempting to read a checkpoint file of version 15 with code of version 12

2014-10-13 Thread ookami a
Dear gmx user: I got this error:Attempting to read a checkpoint file of version 15 with code of version 12, when i'm running my simulation for npt process. Anyone know how could i fix this and why does this happen? I'm running my simulations at Gromacs 4.5.5. Thank you very much! Mengxue --

Re: [gmx-users] Error on gromacs running: Attempting to read a checkpoint file of version 15 with code of version 12

2014-10-13 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 10/13/14 8:50 PM, ookami a wrote: Dear gmx user: I got this error:Attempting to read a checkpoint file of version 15 with code of version 12, when i'm running my simulation for npt process. Anyone know how could i fix this and why does this happen? I'm running my simulations at Gromacs

[gmx-users] grompp Segmentation fault

2014-10-13 Thread Nilesh Dhumal
hello, I running grompp for simulation. I get Segmentation fault error. grompp -f 600.mdp -c cu.gro -p cu_btc_1.top -o 1.tpr checking input for internal consistency... processing topology... Segmentation fault Could any one tell what is the problem? Thanks, Nilesh -- Gromacs Users

[gmx-users] regarding confout.gro

2014-10-13 Thread RINU KHATTRI
hello gromacs user i am working on protein ligand complex with popc membrane i am running production md in extended time (40 ns) i got some file i am using -noappend option i got confout.gro file in each extended time what is the use of this file if i want see my protein or ligand are in proper