On 1/14/15 4:44 PM, Kalev Takkis wrote:
Hi, list!
GROMACS complains about inconsistent shifts and suggests me to check my
topology. I have so done, but the problem is not immediately obvious. How
can I make it tell me exactly which atoms/bonds it finds faulty?
What were you doing when the
Mark,
Thanks for your reply!
I actually found this disscussion about PME, which might be from you?
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/archive-gmx-users/VmK7H5vF9cY
you were saying:The total energy for that interaction is distributed over
the Coul-SR and *Coul. recip terms (which is how PME
Hi, list!
GROMACS complains about inconsistent shifts and suggests me to check my
topology. I have so done, but the problem is not immediately obvious. How
can I make it tell me exactly which atoms/bonds it finds faulty?
All the best,
Kalev Takkis
Institute of Chemistry
Faculty of Science and
Dear GMX developers,
I've encounter a problem in GROMACS concerning the auto-tuning feature
of PME that bugged me for months. As stated in the title, the
auto-tuning feature of mdrun changed my coulomb cutoff from 1.4 nm to
~3.3 nm (stated in md.log) when I set -npme to be 28 (128 total CPU
Dear Justin,
I removed the cmap tems form the .top file as you suggested and the problem
is now solved.
Thanks a lot for your precious help.
Chiara
2015-01-14 0:42 GMT+01:00 Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu:
On 1/13/15 8:18 AM, Chiara Parravicini wrote:
Dear all,
I'd like to use the
Please help me out I have got some error while analyzing my molecular
dynamics output for violations from NMR data. I have used g_disre option
but I get this as ann error pop up
*Program g_disre_d, VERSION 4.6Source code file:
/data/software/gromacs-4.6/src/tools/gmx_disre.c, line:
Hi Jennifer,
You can extract the first frame using the same logic and save it as
PDB/GRO. Then you can use that structure as reference for the second pass.
However, in this case it seems more logical to just write out a PDB
trajectory directly and use 'cat' to combine them in a single file.
Hope
Dear All,
I have got this error while running trjconv from .xtc to .pdb file. The
System includes 8 Protein (4622 Atoms each, x8 = 36976 Atoms). 135978 is
the total number of Atoms in the System. The index.ndx was created from
md.gro file, and I Chose #1 for Protein. I don't know where is the
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 9:00 AM, Jennifer Vo quyvio...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear All,
I have got this error while running trjconv from .xtc to .pdb file. The
System includes 8 Protein (4622 Atoms each, x8 = 36976 Atoms). 135978 is
the total number of Atoms in the System. The index.ndx was created
gmx angle -h suggests -ov -all generates multiple graphs, only the first of
which is the average. What's in the rest of your output file?
Mark
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 7:21 AM, GAYATHRI S gayathr...@iitb.ac.in wrote:
Hello everyone,
I simulated an NADH molecule. I want to check how each of
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 12:39 AM, Eric Smoll ericsm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Gromacs users,
What is the precision limit for values entered in an mdp file for a single
precision gromacs simulation?
For mixed precision probably float.
Does this increase when using gromacs is
compiled in
Dear Mark,
Many thanks for your reply.
My command was:
trjconv_mpi -f md-*.trr -n index.ndx -timestep 100 -o md-*-timestep100.xtc
for every trr file, then concatenate by using
trjcat_mpi -f md-*-timestep100.xtc -n index.ndx -o md-timestep100.xtc
For index.ndx:
make_ndx_mpi -f md.gro -o
On 2015-01-14 10:22, Deep Bhattacharya wrote:
Respected Sir,
I have read up a lot on GROMACS webpages and the problems answered by
you are extremely helpful. I have been facing this problem in computing
violations of distance restraints and I get this error message , I will
be extremely glad
Dear list subscribers,
I am very happy to announce that also this year, the traditional
Molecular Modelling Workshop in Erlangen takes place on
March, Monday 9th to Wednesday 11th, 2015.
Starting on Monday after lunch should allow to avoid travelling on
weekend keeping the expenses
Dear gromacs users,
I am trying to study the cluster formation behavior of oppositely charged
ions in water.
While analyzing the box, it appears that cations and anions forms chains in
the solution like C+A-C+A-
I want to quantify the amount of this chain formation, like whether its
dimer
Dear list,
is there a way to define the lag time for the auto correlation function in
g_rotacf?
Thank you very much,
Max
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
* Can't post? Read
16 matches
Mail list logo