On 04/01/2015 10:20 AM, yoochan wrote:
Hi RJ,
I think you need to inscribe 'source command' in your bash file.
In case of Ubuntu environment, If you insert 'source command' for
/etc/bash.bashrc, you can do use gromacs in all terminals without typing
source command.
This would affect
Hi RJ,
I think you need to inscribe 'source command' in your bash file.
In case of Ubuntu environment, If you insert 'source command' for
/etc/bash.bashrc, you can do use gromacs in all terminals without typing
source command.
You don’t need to set your PATH as you mentioned earlier.
Dear all,
As far as I understand GROMACS did NOT exclude the streaming velocity
(Poisseuille flow) from the temperature calculation and I think it is not
correct. I was wondering if someone has modified Gromacs code to obtain a good
thermostat. Please let me know. Thank you very much.
Tuan.
Dear All
Does the type of chemical bond (single, double, triple), built by JSME
Molecular Editor, directly influence on the final results of Automated
Topology Builder (http://compbio.biosci.uq.edu.au/atb/ ), not by number of
built protons?
I built a molecule with a some double bond, number of
Does the speed of your flows have comparable scale as the speed of sound?
If very less, don't worry about temperature.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 6:10 AM, Ho, Tuan A. tua...@ou.edu wrote:
Dear all,
As far as I understand GROMACS did NOT exclude the streaming velocity
(Poisseuille flow) from the
Hi,
I've done an extensively search out the web but I could not find LJ
parameters for Fluoride (ionic). Gromos54A7 has only Fluorine parameters.
Does anyone knows any new parameters for that?
Best regards!
--
Marcelo Depólo Polêto
Student of MSc Cell and Molecular Biology - UFRGS (Brazil)
I have a custom-FF (OPLSAA based) system with ~8500 atoms, which is a
rectangular graphene sheet with a hole and six pieces of small organics
covalently bound at the hole edge. About 95% of all atoms are electrically
neutral, with the exception of the functional groups mentioned above and a
total
Dear gmx
I have PC has 16 processor with GTX460 where i complied successfully by
following the gmx procedure.
When i run gmx mdrun, it does detects my gpu but i wonder whether its taking
for calculation or not ?
Here i get this info while running mdrun
Using 1 MPI thread
Using 16 OpenMP
On 02/04/2015 6:11 am, RJ ra...@kaist.ac.kr wrote:
Dear gmx
I have PC has 16 processor with GTX460 where i complied successfully by
following the gmx procedure.
When i run gmx mdrun, it does detects my gpu but i wonder whether its
taking for calculation or not ?
Here i get this info while
Thanks a lot for your info Peter and Yoochan,
Adding the source in /etc/bash.bashrc works in ubuntu.
But I tried many times adding in ~/.bashrc before but it never worked to me.
How do i deal wiith centos ? it doesnt have /etc/bash.bashrc file. I also added
in ~/.bashrc but it doesnt work.
Hi,
Google is a good place to seek the answer for you shell and distribution -
sounds like on centos you are not actually using bash!
Mark
On 02/04/2015 4:03 am, RJ ra...@kaist.ac.kr wrote:
Thanks a lot for your info Peter and Yoochan,
Adding the source in /etc/bash.bashrc works in ubuntu.
Hi,
If you're opting for the convenience of recieving the digest, please
consider that replying to it makes it impossible for people to follow the
discussion unless you change the email subject to something useful. In
turn, that might make it slower to get help ;-)
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 6:39
Hi all,
I am trying to simulate a dimer (say A2) where another protein is docked (say
B) which is covalently attached with a prosthetic group.
My question is how to do that.
so far what i did ...
I generate a gro and itp file from PRODRG corresponding to that molecule and
modified the
Hi,
You can use trjconv to get that subset from your trajectory, match it to a
.tpr and then use the ideas at
http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/How-tos/Single-Point_Energy
Mark
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 6:08 PM, xy21hb xy2...@163.com wrote:
Dear all,
I have a simple protein-in-water binary
Does the type of chemical bond (single, double, triple), built by JSME
Molecular Editor, directly influence on the final result of Automated
Topology Builder (http://compbio.biosci.uq.edu.au/atb/
I am working with a local copy of oplsaa.ff where I have defined a set of
custom atom types in atomname2type.n2t and added the bond and angle
parameters into ffbonded. x2top creates the topology without issues, but
grompp reports a fatal error (see subject).
The particular type it complains about
Dear gmx-users,
I am not confident doing the lipid packing in this tutorial (using Maximin 3
instead of KALP15):
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin/gmx-tutorials/membrane_protein/03_solvate.html
And my biggest problem is this error (see my hypothesized solution at the end
On 4/1/15 4:12 PM, Poncho Arvayo Zatarain wrote:
Hello, i´m working in a tutorial to generate a tpr file and i´m using grompp,
my mdp file, .pdb and .top file, -o and .tpr file. I´m using this command for
grompp: grompp
-f dppc128.mdp -c dppc.pdb -p topol_dppc.top -o dppc128_1.tpr
And it
On 4/1/15 4:24 PM, Alex wrote:
That is the issue. I AM using -noparam, and x2top is reverting to an incorrect
bond type. Which then sets off errors in grompp, because indeed it looks up the
bond in ffbonded and sees nothing for the bond type just produced by x2top. As
soon as I manually modify
On 4/1/15 1:49 PM, Debajyoti Dutta wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to simulate a dimer (say A2) where another protein is docked (say
B) which is covalently attached with a prosthetic group.
My question is how to do that.
so far what i did ...
I generate a gro and itp file from PRODRG
I am not mixing forcefield types, but I am indeed mixing angle types. I
suppose I will adjust my constants so the local derivatives near
equilibrium roughly correspond to what I need while sticking to the rtp
default, I can't see another way around.
I have tremendous respect for you guys, but I
On 4/1/15 4:37 PM, Alex wrote:
I am not mixing forcefield types, but I am indeed mixing angle types. I
suppose I will adjust my constants so the local derivatives near
equilibrium roughly correspond to what I need while sticking to the rtp
default, I can't see another way around.
I have
I will certainly consider it.
In all honesty, however, the situation is due to the fact that I have
graphene constants that have been calculated a certain way from the Brenner
potential. The problem at hand can be solved without modifying GMX code by
merely calculating proper constants for _all_
On 4/1/15 4:27 PM, Alex wrote:
I think I solved it already, thanks. Entirely due to horrible mess created
by the necessity to create custom atom types. I wish you guys could make
the bond length tolerance an input to x2top, I really do. :)
Well, I already showed you the function to modify
On 4/1/15 8:30 AM, Vasiliy Znamenskiy wrote:
Dear All
Does the type of chemical bond (single, double, triple), built by JSME
Molecular Editor, directly influence on the final results of Automated
Topology Builder (http://compbio.biosci.uq.edu.au/atb/ ), not by number of
built protons?
I built
True, true. :)
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:
On 4/1/15 4:27 PM, Alex wrote:
I think I solved it already, thanks. Entirely due to horrible mess created
by the necessity to create custom atom types. I wish you guys could make
the bond length tolerance
Hello, i´m working in a tutorial to generate a tpr file and i´m using grompp,
my mdp file, .pdb and .top file, -o and .tpr file. I´m using this command for
grompp: grompp
-f dppc128.mdp -c dppc.pdb -p topol_dppc.top -o dppc128_1.tpr
And it appears two errors: File input/output error:
On 4/1/15 2:03 PM, Alex wrote:
I am working with a local copy of oplsaa.ff where I have defined a set of
custom atom types in atomname2type.n2t and added the bond and angle
parameters into ffbonded. x2top creates the topology without issues, but
grompp reports a fatal error (see subject).
The
I think I solved it already, thanks. Entirely due to horrible mess created
by the necessity to create custom atom types. I wish you guys could make
the bond length tolerance an input to x2top, I really do. :)
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:
On 4/1/15 2:03
29 matches
Mail list logo