Re: [gmx-users] Error:EM did not converge while using polarizable ion

2015-08-01 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 8/1/15 6:38 PM, 折晓会 wrote: Thank you Professor Justin for your reply! The .mdp files for energy minimization and equilibration are shown in the following. During the energy minimization, the simulation stops at step=38, which may be unreasonable. The initial configuration of the system is s

Re: [gmx-users] Regarding-virtual-sites-tutorial

2015-08-01 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 8/1/15 7:08 PM, sujithkakkat . wrote: Dear Justin, I am following your tutorial about CO2 topology using virtual sites. I find that in the topology provided, you have not reassigned the particle type as virtual (V) for the C and O atoms (which are treated as the virtual sites in the model)

[gmx-users] Regarding-virtual-sites-tutorial

2015-08-01 Thread sujithkakkat .
Dear Justin, I am following your tutorial about CO2 topology using virtual sites. I find that in the topology provided, you have not reassigned the particle type as virtual (V) for the C and O atoms (which are treated as the virtual sites in the model). Instead, they are directly selected from th

Re: [gmx-users] Error:EM did not converge while using polarizable ion

2015-08-01 Thread 折晓会
Thank you Professor Justin for your reply! The .mdp files for energy minimization and equilibration are shown in the following. During the energy minimization, the simulation stops at step=38, which may be unreasonable. The initial configuration of the system is simple cubic. The drude particl

Re: [gmx-users] Fwd: DFTB implementation

2015-08-01 Thread Vitaly V. Chaban
You need to provide path to the DFTB+ executable and specify the MM part in gromacs. Take care of versions of both codes! On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 3:01 AM, Zhenyu Meng wrote: > Hi Justin, > I read the manual and it mentions how to specify QM/MM parameters, but no > detail is provided. Also it sa

[gmx-users] About airtual site tutorial

2015-08-01 Thread sujithkakkat .
Dear Justin, I am following your tutorial about CO2 topology using virtual sites. I find that in the topology provided, you have not reassigned the particle type as virtual (V) for the C and O atoms (which are treated as the virtual sites in the model). Instead, they are directly selected from th