Dear users,
recently I have observed a strange behavior of my simulations. The total
potential energy of presumably independent simulations showed undesired
correlation (R=0.6) even when started with different velocities
(gen-seed=-1) and solute coordinates.
I found out that the reason is the
On 12/18/15 8:47 AM, Ganesh Shahane wrote:
Dear Gromacs Users,
I need to simulate a specific polymer which consists of carbon, hydrogen
and fluorine atoms. Could anyone please suggest some force fields for
simulating inorganic polymer molecules that have been ported to gromacs?
Your
Try again =)
On 17 December 2015 at 16:17, shivangi nangia
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> That weblink, however, is not working.
>
> Is there somewhere else I can look.
>
> CHARMM GUI MARTINI membrane builder also does not have POVPC MARTINI ff.
>
>
Dear Gromacs Users,
I need to simulate a specific polymer which consists of carbon, hydrogen
and fluorine atoms. Could anyone please suggest some force fields for
simulating inorganic polymer molecules that have been ported to gromacs?
Thank you.
--
Best Regards,
Ganesh Shahane
--
Gromacs
On 12/18/15 5:42 AM, soumadwip ghosh wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to plot the no.of hydrogen bonds between two parallel
chains of a double stranded DNA as a function of time. What I am observing
is a decrease (which is expected) for two types of nucleic acids but the
problem is the
Hi,
I am doing some simulations in a cluster. I want to know if there is an option
to run the simulation in order that I can close the terminal?. I tried to make
sbatch but the problem is that when I entered the command there is a step to
choose the system and with sbatch I could not choose
On 12/18/15 2:40 PM, Mishelle Oña wrote:
Hi,
I am doing some simulations in a cluster. I want to know if there is an option
to run the simulation in order that I can close the terminal?. I tried to make
sbatch but the problem is that when I entered the command there is a step to
choose the
Hi Nithyanan,
It's guessing a bit, as the actual answer can only be obtained by tracking
some parameters during the simulation, but I would suggest to aim for at
least 200 ns. It think the relaxation will take more time than you have, so
say until (at least) 100 ns, and then you need to have
Dear GROMACS users,
I have performed 50ns MD for 567 aa monomer protein using gromos53a6 ff in
explicit water in the cubic box with 2fs time step.
I have used g_covar and g_anaeig to perform Principal Component Analysis/
Essential Dynamics analysis.
But when I view the animation of the
Hi Nithyanan,
How did you preprocess the trajectory? Did you cluster and/or make
everything whole?
By the way, 50 ns is probably too short for a protein of that size. It will
probably still be relaxing and the eigenvectors will be those of the
relaxation.
Cheers,
Tsjerk
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015
Hi Dr Tsjerk,
I didn't do any clustering or make it whole.
I just use the .xtc that I ontained after the simulation since I found out
there is no pbc effect of the protein.
On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 3:42 AM, Tsjerk Wassenaar wrote:
> Hi Nithyanan,
>
> How did you preprocess
Thanks for your reply Micholas, I ask my system admins but he told me that for
queuing the job I need to enter the selected group in the command line. My
command is g_mmpbsa -f traj.xtc -s topol.tpr -i mmpbsa.mdp -n index.ndx -nomme
-pbsa -nodecomp -apol apolar.xvg -nodiff
My question was if I
Dr Tsjerk,
Thank you for your explanation.
The PDB model I used in this simulation was obtained from I-TASSER.
There is no ligand involved.
Dr, may I know what would be the optimal/ suggested simulation time for
this protein with 567 aa?
On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 4:06 AM, Tsjerk Wassenaar
Not really the best place to ask this question (check with your system admins),
but
You could run your command from a "screen session".
Just run screen when you first log into the machine, go about your business
setting up your simulation and then start it. Once it is running, type
Hi Nithyanan,
Right. So now we have that clear, I've had a look at the PDB file :p
What you see is the result of filtering over a single eigenvector. You
protein is kind of curling up through rotations of domains. You can't
describe these rotations with a single eigenvector. They will be
Hi,
Indeed, we changed this behaviour for 5.0 (and noted it at
http://www.gromacs.org/About_Gromacs/Release_Notes/Versions_5.0.x)
Mark
On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 1:00 AM wrote:
> Dear users,
> recently I have observed a strange behavior of my simulations. The
Hi,
There are some known issues fixed in 4.6 (
http://www.gromacs.org/About_Gromacs/Release_Notes/Versions_4.6.x) but
since the authors of this code haven't added any test cases, AFAIK it could
have gotten broken at any time. I can't see any obvious .mdp issues. I
would encourage you to attempt
17 matches
Mail list logo