Hello gromacs users: I want to determine the deuterium order paramters for a
dppc using gromacs 5.0.4 and i use the command: make_ndx -f npt.tpr -o sn1.ndx.
Also i know that i need to do it too for sn2.ndx. But my question is: Should i
make the index this way:
> a C34
> a C36
> a C37
> a C38
On 11/6/16 8:21 PM, Mishelle Oña wrote:
Hello!
I made a relaxation md simulation with the parameters attached above and in the
output there is no .trr file generated. Am I forgetting something in my mdp
file?
Dear Justin Lemkul,which parameter exactly introduced constant force in during
simulation? exactly in during simulation. it is "pull_coord1_k = 1000 " ?
Many thanks
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List
Hi,
The fftw auto download now uses the new 3.3.5 version, which supports
avx512 SIMD, but I guess they and we haven't tested the aspect of whether
it's configure by works with gcc that is too old. To work around, you can
build fftw yourself, or use one from your distro, or use a newer gcc
Dear users,
I will try to do binding free energy calculation using GROMACS2016 but I am
confused a little bit about the preparation of the input files. I have a
few questions:
1) There are below lines to apply a harmonic distance restraint in the mdp
files of the binding free energy tutorial
Hello gromacs user: I want to determine the deuterium order paramters for a
dppc using gromacs 5.0.4 and i use the command: make_ndx -f npt.tpr -o sn1.ndx.
Also i know that i need to do it too for sn2.ndx. But my question is: Should i
make the index this way:
> a C34
> a C36
> a C37
> a
On 11/6/16 3:11 PM, Jacob Nowatzke wrote:
I've installed GROMACS 2016.1 on my laptop and it works splendidly. When I
install on my desktop, however, it does not.
On the desktop I use:
cmake .. -DGMX_BUILD_OWN_FFTW=ON -DREGRESSIONTEST_DOWNLOAD=ON -DGMX_GPU=ON
-DGMX_USE_OPENCL=ON When I make
I've installed GROMACS 2016.1 on my laptop and it works splendidly. When I
install on my desktop, however, it does not.
On the desktop I use:
>cmake .. -DGMX_BUILD_OWN_FFTW=ON -DREGRESSIONTEST_DOWNLOAD=ON -DGMX_GPU=ON
-DGMX_USE_OPENCL=ON When I make check, it stops short and gives:
checking
On 11/6/16 12:31 PM, amitbe...@chemeng.iisc.ernet.in wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I was initially using GROMACS-5.1.2. But in my institute cluster they have
recently installed GROMACS-5.1.4.
I just wanted to know will there be any difference in result between these
two versions.
Sure, but patch
Hello Everyone,
I was initially using GROMACS-5.1.2. But in my institute cluster they have
recently installed GROMACS-5.1.4.
I just wanted to know will there be any difference in result between these
two versions.
Regards,
Amit Behera
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous
On 11/6/16 10:44 AM, gozde ergin wrote:
This may be unstable, and is generally not done. Turn off charges
linearly, then turn off LJ with a soft-core potential (or vice versa). The
point is you should never have charges on atoms with no (or drastically
reduced) LJ terms. This can be easily
> This may be unstable, and is generally not done. Turn off charges linearly,
> then turn off LJ with a soft-core potential (or vice versa). The point is
> you should never have charges on atoms with no (or drastically reduced) LJ
> terms. This can be easily specified in an appropriate
On 11/6/16 8:27 AM, gozde ergin wrote:
If it's the salt, then take the known Na+ value for the force field and add it
to the SDS value you obtain at infinite dilution. Straightforward.
Ok either I can take hydration free energy of Na from the literature or I can
run 2 thermodynamic
> If it's the salt, then take the known Na+ value for the force field and add
> it to the SDS value you obtain at infinite dilution. Straightforward.
Ok either I can take hydration free energy of Na from the literature or I can
run 2 thermodynamic integration with dodecyl sulfate and Na
On 11/6/16 7:38 AM, gozde ergin wrote:
If you need the total free energy of hydration for NaSDS, you can just decouple
SDS in water with no Na+ and sum the two contributions (SDS and Na+
separately). If you just want the SDS hydration free energy, decouple it in a
box of pure water
> If you need the total free energy of hydration for NaSDS, you can just
> decouple SDS in water with no Na+ and sum the two contributions (SDS and Na+
> separately). If you just want the SDS hydration free energy, decouple it in
> a box of pure water
Thanks Justin,
I have difficulty to
On 11/6/16 1:53 AM, m g wrote:
Dear Justin,
In umbrella sampling tutorial, what force constant was used during the umbrella
sampling simulations?
Please read the contents of the .mdp files provided in the tutorial.
-Justin
--
==
Justin A.
On 11/5/16 11:51 AM, Alex wrote:
Hi,
Concerning to the Na+ charge, if we were interested in the relative binding
free energy in a system (\Delta\Delta G), I mean the difference between two
Free energy in the Ligand and Complex situations, then could you please
confirm me that you can make
Dear Justin,
In umbrella sampling tutorial, what force constant was used during the umbrella
sampling simulations?
Many thanks,
Mr. Ganj
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
* Can't post?
19 matches
Mail list logo