If PRODRG is not giving suitable results . Can I use Antechamber output in
GROMACS for the topology generation of molecules ? .
Regards,
___
ABID ALI
Junior Research Fellow,
Lab No. P-133, Computational Chemistry Unit,
Dr
Hi,
See
http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/How-tos/Steps_to_Perform_a_Simulation
Mark
On Tue, 20 Jun 2017 06:49 Dilip H N wrote:
> Hello all,
> I want to create a molecule (methylamine) and want to run the simulation
> in CHARMM forcefield..
> 1] How can i create
Hello all,
I want to create a molecule (methylamine) and want to run the simulation
in CHARMM forcefield..
1] How can i create the molecule methylamine such tht its residues fit into
CHARMM forcefield..??
2] How do i get its topology/itp for running the simulation..???
3] If the required molecule
Hello:
I would like to measure the C RMSDs between structures from a
trajectory and a PDB structure.
With gmx rms, I get warning messages about different number of atoms
in the input files.
So I create pdb files from the trajectory, with solvent excluded.
But when I run gmx confrms with these
On 6/19/17 8:52 PM, Norfarisha Mohd Fadil wrote:
Dear users,
I ran a WHAM analysis after umbrella sampling simulation, and this error
occurred:
Reading pull force file with pull geometry distance and 1 pull dimensions
Expecting these columns in pull file:
0 reference columns for each
On 6/19/17 8:55 AM, Mohammad fat habadi wrote:
DEAR Users
I have a RNA that has phosphate(P,OP,OP2,OP3) on 5’.
IN RNA and DNA, 3’ has phosphate and 5‘ doesn’t it and for this all Force
fields don’t know phosphate atoms on 5’ of RNA.
pdb2gmx make an error.
IF I delete 5’ phosphate atoms, I
Dear users,
I ran a WHAM analysis after umbrella sampling simulation, and this error
occurred:
Reading pull force file with pull geometry distance and 1 pull dimensions
Expecting these columns in pull file:
0 reference columns for each individual pull coordinate
1 data columns for
Hi,
On Mon, 19 Jun 2017 15:54 Simon Kit Sang Chu wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> I thought including distance restraint file here would still be valid?
>
It is valid. I think Justin overlooked how you separated the different
content from different files.
Although this is called
Hi,
You need to use a tool capable of doing the job. But it is unclear to
anyone reading this how phosphoserine relates to the problem, or what loop
needs to be built.
Mark
On Sun, 18 Jun 2017 22:07 marzieh dehghan wrote:
> thank you very much
>
> I tried to complete
Hi,
We can't support third party build guides, but please follow ours and ask
questions about it here. Provide full details.
Mark
On Mon, 19 Jun 2017 23:39 Guyen Gn wrote:
> I have used the Nvidia's gromacs page to buid and run the gromacs.
> Few months back, I have used
I have used the Nvidia's gromacs page to buid and run the gromacs.
Few months back, I have used the Xeon CPU to build and run
successfully on RHEL7.2. This also used the M6 GPU card.
Now the same build is failing with AVX related compiler error if I use
latest Skylake processor and P100 GPU. I
Hello to all Dear Gromacs Users
I'm modeling a lipid monolayer with vacuum space on top of it and with
periodic boundary conditions in xyz directions. the vacuum space is about
10nm to minimize any possible effect of periodicity. for using ewald
summation as manual mentions :
*"The geometry to
Hello to all Dear Gromacs Users
I'm modeling a lipid monolayer with vacuum space on top of it and with
periodic boundary conditions in xyz directions. the vacuum space is about
10nm to minimize any possible effect of periodicity. for using ewald
summation as manual mentions :
*"The geometry to
Hello to all Dear Gromacs Users
I'm modeling a lipid monolayer with vacuum space on top of it and with
periodic boundary conditions in xyz directions. the vacuum space is about
10nm to minimize any possible effect of periodicity. for using ewald
summation as manual mentions :
*"The geometry to
Hi,
What are you simulating, with what model physics?
Mark
On Mon, 19 Jun 2017 21:13 Mishelle Oña wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got this error. Can anyone explain me what it means.
>
> WARNING: This run will generate roughly 10571 Mb of data
>
> starting mdrun 'UNITED ATOM
Hi,
I got this error. Can anyone explain me what it means.
WARNING: This run will generate roughly 10571 Mb of data
starting mdrun 'UNITED ATOM STRUCTURE FOR MOLECULE LIG in water'
1000 steps, 2.0 ps.
NOTE: Turning on dynamic load balancing
DD cell 3 0 0: Neighboring cells do not
I am using “umbrella pulling” to simulate the dissociation of two molecules. I
would like to calculate the work W(t) that the harmonic trap has performed on
my system up to timestep t, which can be calculated as
W(t) = sum_{i=0}^t F_i * v * dt
where F_i is the biasing force at timestep i, v is
Sincere apologies to this unrelated post to the mailing system.
Please just ignore it!
In fact, when I decided to post a problem that troubles me recently, I
opened then mail client and by coincidence I was just clicking on the
gromacs mailing list which do me a regular push service and thus
Dear Users
I has a RNA that has phosphate atoms (P,OP1,OP2,OP3) on 5'.Most RNA and DNA
have phosphate atoms on 3' not on 5' and for this all force fields don't know
phosphate atoms on 5' of RNA.
pdb2gmx make errors like: OP3 atom isn't on rtp file .If I delete phosphate
atoms from 5' of RNA
Dear Gromacs users,
I am simulating a silica slab and get a warning stating there are “xx
inconsistent shifts, check topology”.
In my .mdp file I already have periodic-molecules=yes.
Is this a common error? Do you recommend any approach to finding what causes it?
Thank you,
Amanda
--
Gromacs
DEAR Users
I have a RNA that has phosphate(P,OP,OP2,OP3) on 5’.
IN RNA and DNA, 3’ has phosphate and 5‘ doesn’t it and for this all Force
fields don’t know phosphate atoms on 5’ of RNA.
pdb2gmx make an error.
IF I delete 5’ phosphate atoms, I don’t have any problems.
How can I solve this
On 6/19/17 5:43 AM, Merril Mathew wrote:
Dear Gromacs users,
I was trying to extract electrostatics and van der Waals interactions for
specific lipid molecules in the system I simulated. I assume you can get
the coulomb and LJ values from energy. But why is there more than one
options to
On 6/19/17 1:51 AM, Simon Kit Sang Chu wrote:
Hi,
I have a protein of interest which requires distance restraint for C alpha
atoms. However, the simulation does not seem to include the restraint at
all.
*prod.mdp*
define = -DPOSRES
constraints = none
integrator
On 6/19/17 3:49 AM, João Henriques wrote:
Dear Imrul,
I believe the information you seek is right there in your xvg file header:
@xaxis label "Time (ns)"
@yaxis label "Number"
...
@ s0 legend "Hydrogen bonds"
@ s1 legend "Pairs within 0.35 nm"
First column is always time
Hi All,
I would like to pull a ligand in a channel from my protein and calculate
the PMF with Umbrella sampling.
How to define in the md_pull.mdp configuration file all the transition
points of my pathtway through which my ligand must pass ?
This channel is not rectilinear and is the result
Dear Gromacs users,
I was trying to extract electrostatics and van der Waals interactions for
specific lipid molecules in the system I simulated. I assume you can get
the coulomb and LJ values from energy. But why is there more than one
options to select for both Coulomb and LJ from the list.?
Dear Imrul,
I believe the information you seek is right there in your xvg file header:
@xaxis label "Time (ns)"
@yaxis label "Number"
...
@ s0 legend "Hydrogen bonds"
@ s1 legend "Pairs within 0.35 nm"
First column is always time (x-axis). All other columns are y-axes for
different
It may come as a huge surprise, but this is a mailing list for a
different software package. ;)
On 6/19/2017 12:49 AM, Youzhi Hao wrote:
hi,
I'm trying to do gcmc simulation of rigid CH4 molecules adsorption isotherms
in clay minerals
by using fix gcmc with fix rigid/nvt/small.
The coulomb
hi,
I'm trying to do gcmc simulation of rigid CH4 molecules adsorption isotherms
in clay minerals
by using fix gcmc with fix rigid/nvt/small.
The coulomb potential was calculated by PPPM.
The fix rigid/nvt/small was combined with fix_modify dynamic/dof yes
and fix_modify temp as the LAMMPS
29 matches
Mail list logo