-- Original --
From:
"gromacs.org_gmx-users-request";;
Date: Tue, Aug 1, 2017 07:16 AM
To: "gromacs.org_gmx-users";
Subject: gromacs.org_gmx-users Digest, Vol 160,
Dear users;
I met some problem when I calculated the binding free energy between
protein and ligand by the g_mmpbsa program. I am sure that I had read the
tutorials of its official website and some other related information, but I
don’t know what should I set the value of pconc or nconc in the
Dear Justin,
Thank you very much.
Best regards,
Mijee
>
> --
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 18:47:12 -0400
> From: Justin Lemkul
> To: gmx-us...@gromacs.org
> Subject: Re: [gmx-users] gmx mdmat calculation of heavy atoms of two
>
Hello Everyone,
I am novice in umbrella sampling. I did followed Dr. Justin's tutorial and it
works fine for me. However, I would like to transport solute (along z-axis)
from an ion channel (intracellular to extracellular site) so I made the system
(Protein+solute+DPPC+Sol+ion) and came upto
Dear Sir
Thank you very much for your reply. Can you give me any link or suggestion
that i can learn for amber force field for protein and ligand.
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 3:53 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
>
>
> On 7/31/17 2:42 PM, Mohammad Zahidul Hossain Khan wrote:
>
>> Dear Sir
Hi all
I have a question on umbrella sampling results under varied ionic strength.
I have just done some regular umbrella sampling on the system of glucose
6-phosphate (small ligand molecule) on oligopeptide with LYS side chains. I
mostly follow the tutorial by Justin
On 7/31/17 5:19 PM, Yuanchao Liu (MSU) wrote:
Hi all
I have a question on umbrella sampling results under varied ionic strength.
I have just done some regular umbrella sampling on the system of glucose
6-phosphate (small ligand molecule) on oligopeptide with LYS side chains. I
mostly follow
On 7/31/17 1:07 PM, Wes Michaels wrote:
Hello,
(Cross-post from my original post here:
https://www.researchgate.net/post/How_can_I_implement_a_radial_potential_field_in_a_MD_simulation_GROMACS)
Is there a way to apply a potential field to all atoms in a simulation box in
GROMACS? I'd like
On 7/31/17 8:03 AM, 王珍 wrote:
Hi all,
I used Gromacs run the biological system, which contains water,
ions(Na+,Cl-), and nucleic. I used gromacs run the system, and the coulombtype
was PME and the cutoff was 10 angstrom, then I want to use the commond rerun
to calculate the
On 7/31/17 1:19 AM, Мижээ Батсайхан wrote:
Dear gmx users,
I would like to know about the hydrophobic interaction between heavy atoms
of side chains in different chains of peptides. How can I use mdmat tool
for this calculation? I separately indexed all heavy atoms but mdmat use
only one
There are insufficient waters in the box to fill it up completely.
Two solutions that come to mind, add more water so it reaches the
appropriate simulated density under those conditions, or run under NPT
until reaches appropriate simulated density then swap back to NVT.
Catch ya,
Dr. Dallas
Hi all
I have a question on umbrella sampling results under varied ionic strength.
I have just done some regular umbrella sampling on the system of glucose
6-phosphate (small ligand molecule) on oligopeptide with LYS side chains. I
mostly follow the tutorial by Justin
Hi,
Did you get any warnings from grompp?
Mark
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 5:48 PM Ali Ahmed wrote:
> Hello GROMACS users,
>
> I'm doing MD for nitrogen, and for better electrostatic interactions I need
> to use massless and charged virtual site. I did that but when I try to
Dear Gromacs users!
I wonder to ask whether is possible to expect an increase in Gromacs
performance with HT technology on my Xeon cpu (72 cpus without HT and 144 with
HT)? How would be better to calibrate mdp options (e.g integrator, adjust
electrostatics cut-offs) to obtain best performance
Dear Sir
I am new for protein-ligand complex. I want amber force field (ff03) for my
protein, tip3p for water model and gaff (General Amber force field) for
ligand. I do not know how to produce gaff force field from pdb and then
convert for gromacs topology.
I have tried ff03 with gromos ligand
Hello,
(Cross-post from my original post here:
https://www.researchgate.net/post/How_can_I_implement_a_radial_potential_field_in_a_MD_simulation_GROMACS)
Is there a way to apply a potential field to all atoms in a simulation box in
GROMACS? I'd like to implement some radial potential energy
Hello GROMACS users,
I'm doing MD for nitrogen, and for better electrostatic interactions I need
to use massless and charged virtual site. I did that but when I try to do
energy minimization gives me LINCS warning and crush. I don't know where is
the error I tried a lot but could not find a
Hi,
Google knows that better than I ;-)
Mark
On Mon, 31 Jul 2017 17:11 Souvik Dey wrote:
> Can you name some of these softwares? I am relatively new in this.
>
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Mark Abraham
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > You
Can you name some of these softwares? I am relatively new in this.
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Mark Abraham
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You need to build in the residue in a way that makes sense. Using some
> other software, but there are some suggestions on the Gromacs
oh, I see.
thx a lot
On 07/31/2017 04:48 PM, Mark Abraham wrote:
Hi,
Only one rank, but I believe it works with the Verlet scheme and thus
openmp and a single GPU.
Mark
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
Hi,
You need to build in the residue in a way that makes sense. Using some
other software, but there are some suggestions on the Gromacs website.
Mark
On Mon, 31 Jul 2017 16:57 Souvik Dey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to run pdb2gmx on a long Amino Acid chain. However,
Hi,
I am trying to run pdb2gmx on a long Amino Acid chain. However, one of the
residues in the middle is incomplete. If I change the residue manually
myself, would there be any problem in connectivity? Else, how do I sort out
this problem?
Souvik
--
Souvik Dey
Integrated Science Education &
Hi,
Only one rank, but I believe it works with the Verlet scheme and thus
openmp and a single GPU.
Mark
On Mon, 31 Jul 2017 16:44 Albert wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Does anybody know whether g_membed support parallel running using
> multiple CPU for a single job?
>
> thanks a
Hi guys,
Does anybody know whether g_membed support parallel running using
multiple CPU for a single job?
thanks a lot
Albert
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
* Can't post? Read
Hi all,
I used Gromacs run the biological system, which contains water,
ions(Na+,Cl-), and nucleic. I used gromacs run the system, and the coulombtype
was PME and the cutoff was 10 angstrom, then I want to use the commond rerun
to calculate the interaction of resid 1 and resid 2, I add
Hello,
the .rtp file is located in the same directory as the force-field. When
i type gmx gmx2pdb . then the log shows that the right path is
considered and loads the needed .rtp fiels that already exist in the
forc-field file. But my custom one is ignored.
Greets
Momin Ahmad
Am
Hi all,
I want to calculate the number of clusters of my glycine molecules during the
course of my simulation. I have read that gmx clustsize is the correct command
to use. I read on one of the previous threads that I will have create a
separate tpr file for the molecule of interest. And I had
Hello everybody,
I'm currently highly involved in the planning of a new HPC cluster for MD
simulations. The main applications are GROMACS (sometimes in conjuction with
PLUMED) and NAMD. Typical simulations are about 100,000 atoms up to 300,000 at
max. So we got a quote from a manufacturer and
Dear GMX users,
I am trying to replicate a molecular flow of small molecules between
two solid slabs of FCC bound atoms. The slabs are bound via LJ
interactions.The flow is created by using periodicity, where the fluid
is accelerated continuously between the two slabs. The periodic box is
created
Dear Gromacs Users,
I would like to get a simple plot of RMSD versus time for two trajectories
in *.gro
format, where RMSD is calculated between structures at the same time, i.e.
snap11 - snap12
snap21 - snap22
snap31 - snap32
snap41 - snap42
.
.
.
where snap31 means third snapshot of the first
DA is the Adenine residue. It goes fine with other forcefields like
CHARMM27 and AMBER99 SBILDN. In my knowledge, there's no problem in the
parameters.
Souparno Adhikary,
CHPC Lab,
Department of Microbiology,
University of Calcutta.
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Mark Abraham
What is DA, and from your background knowledge of this force field, does it
have suitable parameters or topologies for DA?
Mark
On Mon, 31 Jul 2017 11:02 Souparno Adhikary wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was trying to simulate a protein-DNA complex using gromos54a7 forcefield.
>
Hi,
I don't understand your description of the problem, but you don't need to
do anything with gmxlib in order to follow my solution, so make your life
easy and do that.
Mark
On Mon, 31 Jul 2017 10:36 Souparno Adhikary wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There's a new problem. Sysadmins
Hi all,
I was trying to simulate a protein-DNA complex using gromos54a7 forcefield.
The error comes as,
Fatal error:
Residue 'DA' not found in residue topology database
Clearly, it is not finding the DA residue in its database. How can I solve
this?
Thanks,
Souparno Adhikary,
CHPC Lab,
Hi all,
I was trying to simulate a protein-DNA complex using gromos54a7 forcefield.
The error comes as,
Fatal error:
Residue 'DA' not found in residue topology database
Clearly, it is not finding the DA residue in its database. How can I solve
this?
Thanks,
Souparno Adhikary,
CHPC Lab,
*Hi all,>> I am calculating the RDF from a particular residue to a
particular> glycine molecule. I created an index file for both to do this.
My> simulation box is 1.5nm, but the RDF values are in the range of
2nm-3nm.> I have viewed my trajectory and all the components stay inside
the box.>
Hi,
There's a new problem. Sysadmins installed the GROMACS 5.1.4 as a module in
the cluster. We need to load it everytime we login as "module load
gromacs-5.1.4". Now, if I mention GMXLIB path to the new forcefield files,
the previous default installation of gromacs (4.5.6) points to it.
How can
I think you can use -cut 0 -rmax 1.5 this will give you the RDF upto 1.5
nm.- Message from "Pandya, Akash" -
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 07:29:19 +
From: "Pandya, Akash"
Reply-To: gmx-us...@gromacs.org
Subject:
Hi gromacs users,
I am trying to simulate a crystal supershell (5x5x5 unit cells) with
martini ff in gromacs 5.
I build the system in aa representation, then I converted it in CG using
the martinize.py script,
following the tutorial, I've done a brief equilibration in water, the
after the
hi dear!can anyone please suggest me what does it mean."In chosen Force field
there is no residue type for QLN"there was no QLN in our origin file. There is
always a problem when i select any force field.regards
On Monday, 31 July 2017, 12:29, "Pandya, Akash"
Hi all,
I am calculating the RDF from a particular residue to a particular glycine
molecule. I created an index file for both to do this. My simulation box is
1.5nm, but the RDF values are in the range of 2nm-3nm. I have viewed my
trajectory and all the components stay inside the box. Please
41 matches
Mail list logo