Dear Gerrit,
After trying a few different settings of .mdp, I found that "cutoff-scheme =
Verlet" and "QMMMscheme = ONIOM" were causing the error. Would you have any
idea how were these two settings linked to the generation of ".pc" file, and
what would you suggest if I have to run under
On 11/28/17 1:00 PM, RAHUL SURESH wrote:
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 at 7:14 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
On 11/28/17 4:54 AM, RAHUL SURESH wrote:
I am trying to simulate a metal-protein interaction using gromacs 2016
package and charmm36 ff.
I have prepared the initial pdb by
First tests hints at ~10% better performance on Broadwell CPUs compared
to 2016.4 on the ion_channel case we got from Erik L.
This using the same compiler toolchain version.
Will test more tomorrow :-)
On 11/28/2017 07:09 PM, Mark Abraham wrote:
> 2018 will look and work, and most importantly
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 12:25 PM, ali akgün wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can i generate mdp file for pressure through one direction system.For
> example:
>
> Ref pressure:
>
> X direction:1.0 bar
> Other direction: 0.0 bar
>
Yes, see the options here:
Hi GROMACS users,
The first beta release of GROMACS 2018 is available! (We know it's only
2017 right now, but by the time we make the real release it will be almost
2018, so that seems like a good idea!)
We are making this available to you to get an early taste of how GROMACS
2018 will look and
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 at 7:14 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
>
>
> On 11/28/17 4:54 AM, RAHUL SURESH wrote:
> > I am trying to simulate a metal-protein interaction using gromacs 2016
> > package and charmm36 ff.
> > I have prepared the initial pdb by performing an oniom calculations
>
Hi
Yeah. I understood that.. thanks a lot for your patience
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 at 7:10 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
>
>
> On 11/27/17 11:55 PM, RAHUL SURESH wrote:
> > Dear Justin
> >
> > It worked. Actually by its own. I reconstructed the pdb and gave again.
>
> For the sake of
Hi,
Can i generate mdp file for pressure through one direction system.For
example:
Ref pressure:
X direction:1.0 bar
Other direction: 0.0 bar
Thank you.
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
Thanks, but it doesn't work. Same problem.
Gianmarco Bartalini
Il 27 nov 2017 14:37, "Justin Lemkul" ha scritto:
>
>
> On 11/27/17 6:04 AM, GIANMARCO BARTALINI wrote:
>
>> Hello guys, I produced a system "protein + lipid membrane" using the
>> online
>> tool CHARMM-GUI. Since
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 2:30 AM, rose rahmani wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 1:55 AM, Alex wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The answer is clearly in the error, just read it please:
>> 2.848793 > 0.49 * (4/2) where 4 is the box length.
>>
>>> But i
On 11/28/17 10:00 AM, rose rahmani wrote:
Would "pull_geometry=periodic-distance" be another solution for it?
No. That affects how the reaction coordinate distance is calculated, not
the PBC treatment, which is intrinsic to any simulation using PBC.
-Justin
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 5:11
Would "pull_geometry=periodic-distance" be another solution for it?
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 5:11 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
>
>
> On 11/28/17 12:23 AM, rose rahmani wrote:
>
>> Hello;
>>
>> I took 2000 configuration from trajconv. Amino acid is in its normal shape
>> till almost
On 11/28/17 4:54 AM, RAHUL SURESH wrote:
I am trying to simulate a metal-protein interaction using gromacs 2016
package and charmm36 ff.
I have prepared the initial pdb by performing an oniom calculations between
protein and metal (at various positions) using gaussian 09 and chose the
On 11/28/17 12:23 AM, rose rahmani wrote:
Hello;
I took 2000 configuration from trajconv. Amino acid is in its normal shape
till almost conf1000.gro(and a little more). But in for example
conf1300.gro amino acid was disintegrated. What does it mean? Would you
please help me?
Bonds can't
On 11/27/17 11:55 PM, RAHUL SURESH wrote:
Dear Justin
It worked. Actually by its own. I reconstructed the pdb and gave again.
For the sake of completeness, the original problem was indeed due to a
massive box size, which was probably just incorrectly set. You had a
92-nm y-box vector and
I am trying to simulate a metal-protein interaction using gromacs 2016
package and charmm36 ff.
I have prepared the initial pdb by performing an oniom calculations between
protein and metal (at various positions) using gaussian 09 and chose the
structure with maximum binding energy. The metal ion
16 matches
Mail list logo