Depends. If you're interested in local folding and there are SS motifs in
the region you're interested, then yes. If not, no. In terms of overall
folding of the entire protein, yes it surely can be an important analysis.
J
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Neha Gupta
Thank you Joao and Aman.
I have noted the points you have suggested.
Do you think analyzing DSSP would help?
Thanks,
Neha
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 4:03 PM, João Henriques <
joao.m.a.henriq...@gmail.com> wrote:
> "You can use various supporting tools from R language to debug your
> trajectory
Hi,
Dynamic selections are implemented, but only for a small subset of GROMACS
tools. You can use gmx select to form the appropriate index group, but
you'd have to write some other script to get trjconv to pull out individual
frames with the matching selection, and then concatenate them into a
"You can use various supporting tools from R language to debug your
trajectory but most third party software support NAMD and charmm format.
You can use VMD to convert the trajectory to dcd and use R language based
packages to read your trajectory"
What? How is this useful or helpful? At most it
Hi,
The large energy means your topology is probably broken. Please use a tool
that will write an .itp file for you (e.g. SwissParam?), or next time get
your topology for your ligand working before you try to use it in a
complex. Even get a simple form of the ligand working first, to teach
Hi,
From its help: "gmx distance calculates distances between pairs of
positions as a function of
time. Each selection specifies an independent set of distances to calculate.
Each selection should consist of pairs of positions, and the distances are
computed between positions 1-2, 3-4, etc."
Very unlikely and/or impractical. The water selections/analyses you can do
with gromacs' native tools are unfortunately rather limited. From personal
experience I'd suggest trying MDAnalysis or something similar, because it
gives you the freedom to code your our analysis routine with minimal
To be included here, the ligand I have uploaded seems to be so congested
and out of form. Look literally like a clumsy ball.
I am not sure what make this happen.
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 2:51 PM, RAHUL SURESH
wrote:
> Dear Alex
>
> I have tried that but the system
Dear Alex
I have tried that but the system collapse. For em_real.mdp option,I get
message stating
Energy minimization has stopped, but the forces have not converged to the
requested precision Fmax < 1000 (which may not be possible for your system).
It stopped because the algorithm tried to make
Hi Mark,
I think with a combined project list as long as my arm and going between VMD
and Gromacs that the fault lies with me. A misunderstanding with the decimal
point. However, I am a little confused over the output and despite reading the
help I am still none the wiser.
I go on to select
The description for the Urey-Bradley potential (assuming two quadratic
terms qualify for the proud term "potential") is described in the user
manual, and the constants' order of appearance in the itp file is given
in the Table 5.5 of the manual. If you have a basic quadratic angular
term
Dear all,
I'm performing a dynamic of a metal ion in a box consisting of a solvent, where
the metal is coordinated by six solvent molecules.
I'm writing here because I want to reduce the trajectory including the intire
box to a trajectory containing only the first coordination shell of the
12 matches
Mail list logo