Hi,
That's the wrong way around. :-) One doesn't do a lab experiment first and
then decide what you wanted to observe from it, to either :-). There are
tutorials for computing free energy of solvation, which I suggest you
follow, and I suspect your fully solvated simulation won't be useful for
thank you so much.
now i understand this.
On 1/9/19, Justin Lemkul wrote:
>
>
> On 1/9/19 3:31 AM, SHAHEE ISLAM wrote:
>> it is connected with aggregation phenomenon.
>
> Maybe, but no force field is parametrized with protein aggregation in
> mind. Mark is cautioning you that you may be seeking
Dear all users,
I am new for using GROMACS. and also read the tutorial of Methane and water. I
have already simulated data of 100 ns for four histones. I want to know how to
calculate free energy solvation from this data. which topology file and
coordinate files I will use?
I will appreciate
Tomas,
Again, thanks for the response.
On re-reading the data Exxact Corp sent ( always helps to review) they did use
a 2080ti and two zions.
Your point on maxing out the GPU is interesting. On the 8 core ( 16T) the GPU
is maxed out as you inferred, but not on the 32 core (64T) with which
Dear all users,
I am new for using GROMACS. and also read the tutorial of Methane and water. I
have already simulated data of 100 ns for four histones. I want to know how to
calculate free energy solvation from this data. which topology file and
coordinate files I will use?
I will appreciate
Thanks Mark for your reply
In the log and edr files I only see an "Position Rest." term. So do you mean
that the contributions on the dihedral restrains is added in in total energy
without additional terms in the energy output in log file and the edr ?
Thank you in advance for the
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 4:54 PM Wahab Mirco <
mirco.wa...@chemie.tu-freiberg.de> wrote:
> There was currently a thread regarding ways of using Gromacs on
> Windows systems. This cause me to try to download v.2019 to
> a Windows build machine and see what the NATIVE BUILD looks like.
>
>
There was currently a thread regarding ways of using Gromacs on
Windows systems. This cause me to try to download v.2019 to
a Windows build machine and see what the NATIVE BUILD looks like.
Installed on the Machine and used for the build were:
- Visual Studio 2017 ("Visual Studio 15 Win64" in
Dear gromacs-users,
I generated and equilibrated a box (4 x 4 x 4 nm) containing a mixture
of water and methanol. With this I wanted to solvate my protein:
gmx solvate -cp protein.gro -cs wat-methanol.gro -o prot_solv.gro -p
topol.top
However, this results in an error starting with:
***
Dear Paul and Mark,
Thank you for the suggestions. I just upgraded NVIDIA driver from 384 to
410 and the problem is solved.
Regards,
Adarsh V. K.
--
Message: 6
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 18:29:18 -0600
From: paul buscemi
To: "gmx-us...@gromacs.org"
Subject: Re:
On 1/9/19 3:31 AM, SHAHEE ISLAM wrote:
it is connected with aggregation phenomenon.
Maybe, but no force field is parametrized with protein aggregation in
mind. Mark is cautioning you that you may be seeking a meaningless
quantity.
To calculate the interaction energy, you need to define
On 1/9/19 6:07 AM, Dr. Seema Mishra wrote:
Hello
Any idea how to generate RMSD plots for only the protein in a protein-peptide
complex? I mean, do give me commands for using only the protein backbone atoms
as the g_rmsd uses all backbone atoms of peptide as well and I do not want
peptide
Hi Javed,
I hope *gmx rama* will solve the issue.
http://manual.gromacs.org/archive/5.0.4/programs/gmx-rama.html
Thanks & Regards,
--
*Subhomoi Borkotoky, Ph. D.*
DBT Research Associate,
Kusuma School of Biological Sciences,
Indian Institute of Technology Delhi,
New
Hi,
IIRC that's enough, for dihedral restraints. You will see energy
contributions from the the restraints appear in your .log and .edr files if
the restraints are active. I don't recall if there is anything printed by
mdrun before the simulation commences.
Mark
On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 10:14 AM
Hello
Any idea how to generate RMSD plots for only the protein in a protein-peptide
complex? I mean, do give me commands for using only the protein backbone atoms
as the g_rmsd uses all backbone atoms of peptide as well and I do not want
peptide RMSD plots included.
Thanks in anticipation
--
Hi,
I use the python MDAnalysis packages for this.
https://github.com/MDAnalysis/mdanalysis/issues/1335
https://www.mdanalysis.org/mdanalysis/documentation_pages/analysis/dihedrals.html
Have a nice day, Tamas
On 01/09/2019 10:30 AM, za...@tezu.ernet.in wrote:
Dear Users
Can anyone suggest
Hello,
I want to use gmx select to get a list of protein residues that interact
with PO4 beads (CG) in a bilayer: The command I am using is:
gmx select -s system.gro -f traj.xtc -oi contacting_residues_DOPG.dat
-resnr number -n PO4_index_1.ndx -select 'group Protein and same residue
as
Hi,
I am calculating the rdf of my system as follows.
1. rdf of oxygen atom of my drug and water this is successful (I just made
an index file and for water i choose eg. 5 & a OW) this worked fine.
2. I want now to calculate the rdf of oxygen in my drug and oxygen from the
hydroxyl group of the
Dear Users
Can anyone suggest me any available tool to analyze ramachandran plot
timewise for a trajectory?
Thank You
Regards
Zaved Hazarika
Research Scholar
Dept. Of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology,
Tezpur University,
India
* * * D I S C L A I M E R * * *
This e-mail may contain
Hello
I would like to apply some dihedral restraints in different residues of my
protein during the production stage. For that I have added at the end of the
protein itp the section
[ dihedral_restraints ]. Is it enough ? Should I add something else in the mdp
? In other words, how to be
Thank you for your replay.
I will check it out
On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 6:58 AM Mark Abraham
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As I'm sure you know from reading up on membed, it works by scaling the
> embedded protein to be tiny and turning off its interactions. The mostly
> likely issue is that you didn't give
it is connected with aggregation phenomenon.
On 1/9/19, Mark Abraham wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How is the protein-protein interaction energy defined? What physical
> observable is it connected to?
>
> Mark
>
> On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 9:03 AM SHAHEE ISLAM wrote:
>
>> can anyone please tell me, if i select
Hi,
How is the protein-protein interaction energy defined? What physical
observable is it connected to?
Mark
On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 9:03 AM SHAHEE ISLAM wrote:
> can anyone please tell me, if i select 42 then wheather it will
> calculate the protein-protein interaction energy? because i did
23 matches
Mail list logo