Re: [gmx-users] Is Gromos force fields not recommended?

2020-02-18 Thread Berk Hess
If the GROMOS force-field would clearly not be compatible with GROMACS, we would have removed it from the GROMACS distribution. There are two issues here, which both stem from the fact that the GROMOS force-field has been parametrized with a simulation setup that, for good reasons, can not be

Re: [gmx-users] .dat file from gmx densmap does not match prescribed size

2020-01-22 Thread Berk Hess
? By the way, the simulation box is 47.72970 x 5.51140 x 35.37240 nanometers (if that may help understanding the issue). Thanks, Michele From: gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se on behalf of Berk Hess Sent: 22 January 2020 16:49 To: gmx-us

Re: [gmx-users] .dat file from gmx densmap does not match prescribed size

2020-01-22 Thread Berk Hess
How are you counting the elements? Lines with 3531 elements are very long, so they can easily exceed some limit. /Berk From: gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se on behalf of Michele Pellegrino Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2020 5:16 PM To:

Re: [gmx-users] com motion and position restraints may cause artifacts

2020-01-17 Thread Berk Hess
Hi, Using center of mass motion removal in combination with an absolute reference in the system, such as position restraints, will always lead to artifacts, as physical motion is removed and not drift due to numerical rounding errors. For the most common case of equilibrating macromolecules

Re: [gmx-users] problems with pull code on Martini CG

2019-04-11 Thread Berk Hess
Hi, You should not use direction-periodic, you don't want to pull more than half the box size, I presume. Your pull rate is extremely high 50 nm/ns. I would start by lowering this. Cheers, Berk From: gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se on

Re: [gmx-users] PME constant shifts.

2019-03-29 Thread Berk Hess
are FF development and finding bugs in my FF. Although the absolute energies are meaningless it would be nice if they could be intuitively correct. Best regards and thanks again! Sergio On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 1:45 PM Berk Hess wrote: > Hi, > > The negative energy is due to th

Re: [gmx-users] PME constant shifts.

2019-03-29 Thread Berk Hess
Hi, The negative energy is due to the uniform background charge that appears when your system has a net charge, not due to shifting of pair interactions. Computing the absolute energy of a periodic system with net charge is meaningless. Cheers, Berk From:

Re: [gmx-users] AWH with multiple parallel simulations

2019-03-28 Thread Berk Hess
Hi, Indeed, the former can be very beneficial, even in the case all replicas start at the same point. The latter is an interesting idea (even better when using REST instead of T-REMD), but would require adaption of the exchange criterion. Just exchanging ignoring the bias will likely give

Re: [gmx-users] edit dhdl.xvg file

2019-03-04 Thread Berk Hess
gmx energy -b -e -odh should extract the xvg file you want from the energy file. Berk From: gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se on behalf of Qasim Pars Sent: Friday, March 1, 2019 8:38 PM To: gmx-us...@gromacs.org Subject: [gmx-users] edit

Re: [gmx-users] Pull code errors

2019-02-25 Thread Berk Hess
Yes, this is due to an improvement. Set the pbcatom (as the error message tries to say) for the pull groups mentioned. The options are described in the mdp section of the manual. Berk From: gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se on behalf of Mark

Re: [gmx-users] AWH with two bias potentials

2019-02-15 Thread Berk Hess
I will now further adjust the parameters based on what you said. Also with the 2D bias, gmx awh now generates a 2D PMF as a XYZ triplet which I can plot easily, so thanks also for that. Cedric Le 2/15/2019 à 3:50 PM, Berk Hess a écrit : > Your initial error parameters is orders of magnitude

Re: [gmx-users] AWH with two bias potentials

2019-02-15 Thread Berk Hess
-r--r--. 1 cleyrat granier 7.5G Feb 14 20:51 step7_awh5_step96200.cpt -bash-4.2$ Is this some kind of bug or am I doing something wrong with the parameters? Cedric Le 2/14/2019 à 8:09 PM, Berk Hess a écrit : > Note though, as also noted in the manual, you need to be careful what you >

Re: [gmx-users] AWH with two bias potentials

2019-02-14 Thread Berk Hess
-bash-4.2$ Is this some kind of bug or am I doing something wrong with the parameters? Cedric Le 2/14/2019 à 8:09 PM, Berk Hess a écrit : > Note though, as also noted in the manual, you need to be careful what you > wish for. 2D biasing leads to uniform sampling of the requested recta

Re: [gmx-users] AWH with two bias potentials

2019-02-14 Thread Berk Hess
on the free-energy. From: gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se on behalf of Berk Hess Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2019 5:41 PM To: gmx-us...@gromacs.org Subject: Re: [gmx-users] AWH with two bias potentials I see now that you used awh-nbias=2 with awh-ndim

Re: [gmx-users] AWH with two bias potentials

2019-02-14 Thread Berk Hess
reaction coordinate from gmx awh. Each file has two columns (x=coordinate 1, y=PMF or x=coordinate 2, y=PMF). My coding and maths skills are quite limited so if you have a script that can convert these data to a 2D format, I would be happy to use it. Cedric Le 2/14/2019 à 3:27 PM, Berk Hess a écrit

Re: [gmx-users] AWH with two bias potentials

2019-02-14 Thread Berk Hess
gmx awh writes out the 2D (or any-D) PMF to xvg files for different times. The 1D nature of xvg files is not convenient for visualization though, so you need to write a script to convert it to you favorite 2D data format. I probably have a script somewhere for some 2D format (python?) if you