O 180 43.932 2
Are both entries required in the gromacs [ improper ] section or must I
put only one of them?
Thanks,
Daniel
--
Daniel Bauer, M.Sc.
TU Darmstadt
Computational Biology & Simulation
Schnittspahnstr. 2
64287 Darmstadt
ba...@cbs.tu-darmstadt.de
--
Grom
the GROMACS
website at http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Errors
---
Best regards,
Daniel
--
Daniel Bauer, M.Sc.
TU Darmstadt
Computational Biology & Simulation
Schnittspahnstr. 2
64287 Darmstadt
ba...@cbs.tu-darmstadt.de
Don't t
s,
Daniel
--
Daniel Bauer, M.Sc.
TU Darmstadt
Computational Biology & Simulation
Schnittspahnstr. 2
64287 Darmstadt
ba...@bio.tu-darmstadt.de
Don't trust atoms, they make up everything.
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mai
ng now Tom Cheatham's
> parameters (J. Phys. Chem. B, 2008, 112 (30), pp 9020–9041).
>
> I hope that helps
> Best
> Felipe
>
> On 08/05/18 15:54, Daniel Bauer wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>> We are trying to use amber99sb-ildn with gromacs2018.1 for simu
continuation = no
lincs_order = 4
lincs_iter = 1
lincs-warnangle = 30
morse = no
Best Regards,
Daniel
--
Daniel Bauer, M.Sc.
TU Darmstadt
Computational Biology & Simulation
Schnittspahnstr. 2
64287 Darmstadt
ba...@cb
if the reduced bandwidth
will hurt GROMACS performance due to bottlenecks in GPU/CPU
communication and/or communication via InfiniBand. If this is the case,
we might have to upgrade to new mainboards with dual x16 support.
Best regards,
Daniel
--
Daniel Bauer, M.Sc.
TU Darmstadt
Computational
= 298.0
gen_seed = -1
; COM motion removal
; These options remove motion of the protein/bilayer relative to the
solvent/ions
comm-mode = Linear
comm-grps = Other Water_and_ions Protein
Best regards,
Daniel
--
Daniel Bauer, M.Sc.
TU Darmstadt
Computational Biology &a
2/4/17 12:21 PM, Daniel Bauer wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I finally found my error in the conversion. As always, the devil is in
>> the detail. I was under the assumption that parameters listed in the
>> original forcefield files (toppar) are also sigma and epsilon values
).
With the correct conversion term:
eps = Rmin/(10*2^(1/6))
I can now reproduce the conversion of the numbers from the charmm
implementation to gromacs (and thus know how to apply my NBFIX for this
value).
Thanks for your patience and best regards,
Daniel
On 12/03/2017 10:18 PM, Daniel Bauer wrote
are the way they are? It must be more than a
direct conversion of the numbers from kcal to kJ. Or did I again made a
mistake or took the wrong numbers?
Best regards,
Daniel
On 12/03/2017 11:23 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
>
>
> On 12/3/17 4:18 PM, Daniel Bauer wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
&g
not sure how to proceed
without doing the reparametrization in gromacs again, because the stock
values differ that much.
Best regards,
Daniel
--
Daniel Bauer, M.Sc.
TU Darmstadt
Computational Biology & Simulation
Schnittspahnstr. 2
64287 Darmstadt
ba...@cbs.tu-darmstadt.de
Don't trust a
Hello,
First of all you can try to reproduce basic lipid properties as the area
per lipid and bilayer thickness. Both can be easily calculated from the
position of lipid headgroups.
Other useful properties is the diffusion rate of lipids (accessable by
calculating the mean square displacement)
ption should be removed in favour of logic based around whether an
> input checkpoint file (which can be constructed to be sane wrt the intended
> simulation) was supplied to mdrun.
>
> Mark
>
> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 3:54 PM Daniel Bauer <ba...@cbs.tu-darmstadt.de>
&g
Hello,
This might be a trivial question for most of you but can someone give me
more detail about what the 'continuation' flag in the .mdp settings
does? The manual does not include a lot of information on that.
Best regards,
Daniel
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
On 05/02/2017 07:45 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
>
> Your input configurations is probably broken across PBC, so grompp
> does a clunky calculation and thinks things are split really far
> apart. It doesn't matter though, because CHARMM36 doesn't use charge
> groups. Every atom is its own group so
Hello,
I need to run a simulation of a membrane system with CHARMM36 and
energygrp exclusions. Therefore, I used the mdp settings suggested by
the gromacs page but a lower rvdw-switch (0.8 instead of 1.0) to better
reproduce DPPC lipid params:
constraints = h-bonds
cutoff-scheme = Group
vdwtype
Hello,
I need to run a simulation of a membrane system with CHARMM36 and
energygrp exclusions. Therefore, I used the mdp settings suggested by
the gromacs page but a lower rvdw-switch (0.8 instead of 1.0) to better
reproduce DPPC lipid params:
constraints = h-bonds
cutoff-scheme = Group
vdwtype
Did you forget to set an initial temperature distribution? In your mdp you
set gen_vel to no. So it will not create an initial velocity distribution
matching your temperature. For the first simulation of your workflow, you
should set gen_vel: yes and continuation: no. Then for all simulation that
also set restrains on omega dihedrals?
(I dont think it matters but Im using Gromacs 2016.1)
Best regards,
Daniel Bauer
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
* Can't post? Read http
19 matches
Mail list logo