Hi Gromacs users,
I am studying antigen-antibody interaction at protein level. I have a
protein sequence (no crystal structure, length 180 residues) of the
antigen, and have predicted the secondary structure of it (and modeled). By
performing conserved domain search using inferno and NCBI I found
Hi All,
I have run an extended simulation for 90ns like this: (my previous run was
for 10ns)
grompp -f new.mdp -c old.tpr -o new.tpr
mdrun -s new.tpr -cpi old.cpt
I output mdrun STDOUT to an output file and it looks like this:
##
Back Off! I just
Dear ALL,
I have run an extended simulation for 90ns like this: (my previous run was
for 10ns)
grompp -f new.mdp -c old.tpr -o new.tpr
mdrun -s new.tpr -cpi old.cpt
because, I had to make changes in the .mdp file. I have got new files
from the new extended run;
new.tpr, new.xtc etc
My
Dear ALL,
I have run an extended simulation for 90ns like this: (my previous run was
for 10ns)
grompp -f new.mdp -c old.tpr -o new.tpr
mdrun -s new.tpr -cpi old.cpt
because, I had to make changes in the .mdp file. I have got new files
from the new extended run;
new.tpr, new.xtc etc
My
Hi All,
I have run an extended simulation for 90ns like this: (my previous run was
for 10ns)
grompp -f new.mdp -c old.tpr -o new.tpr
mdrun -s new.tpr -cpi old.cpt
because, I had to make changes in the .mdp file. I have got new files
from the new extended run;
new.tpr, new.xtc etc
My
Hello All,
I ran a 10ns simulation on a wild and mutant type of a protein complex.
Attached is the rmsf graph. "Green" is the mutant protein with mutation at
residue 71 (marked) and "purple" is the wild protein. After looking at the
graph can it be said that the mutant has made the complex more
Hello All,
I ran a 10ns simulation on a wild and mutant type of a protein complex.
Attached is the rmsf graph. "Green" is the mutant protein with mutation at
residue 71 (marked) and "purple" is the wild protein. After looking at the
graph can it be said that the mutant has made the complex more
Hello All,
I ran a 10ns simulation on a wild and mutant type of a protein complex.
Attached is the rmsf graph. "Green" is the mutant protein with mutation at
residue 71 (marked) and "purple" is the wild protein. After looking at the
graph can it be said that the mutant has made the complex more
Thanks Marc!
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 6:07 PM, Mark Abraham <mark.j.abra...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You're reading too far into http://swift.cmbi.ru.nl/gv/dssp/. The first
> two
> sentences are useful for you ;-)
>
> Mark
>
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at
Hello All,
Can someone please help me get the "dssp" executable? For secondary
structure analysis.
I did this:
rsync -avz rsync://rsync.cmbi.ru.nl/dssp/ /path_to_dssp/
This downloaded all dssp pdb files but no executable. I am doing this
because I got the error on gromacs run.
Fatal error:
Hello All,
I have done MD of a native pdb structure 2LL7 for 10ns. Looking at the
trajectories in PyMOL, I see that in the native structure one of the helix
(short separate chain ID) tends to unfold. Is this possible in the
simulation of native complexes?
Thanks & Regards.
--
Gromacs Users
Hello All,
I have done MD of a native pdb structure 2LL7 for 10ns. Looking at the
trajectories in PyMOL, I see that in the native structure one of the helix
(short separate chain ID) tends to unfold. Is this possible in the
simulation of native complexes?
Thanks & Regards.
--
Gromacs Users
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
> Center for Molecular Biophysics
>
>
> From: gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se <
> gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se> on behalf of Deep
> kumar <deepak.choube...@gmail.com>
> S
Hello All,
I have performed MD on a protein water for 10ns, protein with total 164
residues in two chains. I have got the result graphs of radius of gyration
and rmsd for both wild and mutant. Wanted to attach the graphs but could
not due to bytes limit. There is one residue mutation (M -> T) in
Hello,
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 1:11 AM, Justin Lemkul <jalem...@vt.edu> wrote:
>
>
> On 9/6/17 3:46 PM, Deep kumar wrote:
>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> I have produced the "ITP" files of the ligands using ATB server. I am
>> mentioning the steps here,
Dear All,
I have produced the "ITP" files of the ligands using ATB server. I am
mentioning the steps here, please let me know if you think anything is
wrong.
a) uploaded the coordinates of ligand "RND" on ATB server. I chose
"heteromoelcule" molecule type.
b) Entered the "net charge" by
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin/gmx-tutorials/complex/06_equil.html)
says, I have to prepare a position restraint file "posre_RND.itp" from the
"RND.gro" file, so how can I get the "RND.gro" file?
Thanks,
Deep
On Tue, Sep 5, 201
17 matches
Mail list logo