that show this behavior.
Rajat
On Fri, 8 Feb 2019, 5:27 pm Justin Lemkul
>
> On 2/8/19 5:17 AM, Rajat Desikan wrote:
> > Hi Mala,
> > Please combine -center with "-pbc mol -ur compact" and check.
>
> Compact unit cell representation is only useful for dode
Hi Mala,
Please combine -center with "-pbc mol -ur compact" and check.
Regards,
Rajat
--
Dr. Rajat Desikan
Invictus Oncology, Delhi
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
* Can't
:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 7:43 PM Rajat Desikan
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Mark,
> >
> > Thank you for the quick answer. My group is experimenting with a
> GPU-heavy
> > processor-light configuration similar to the Amber machines available
> from
> > Exxact (
Justin,
Lovely advice. I'll definitely consider it :) Thank you.
Regards,
Rajat
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 11:15 PM Justin Lemkul wrote:
>
>
> On 7/16/18 1:42 PM, Rajat Desikan wrote:
> > Hi Mark,
> >
> > Thank you for the quick answer. My group is experimenting with
on, Jul 16, 2018 at 6:47 PM Rajat Desikan
> wrote:
>
> > Dear all,
> > I'm trying to install openmm enabled version of gromacs 4.6.7 on a 6-core
> > i7 machine with two GTX 1080 Ti GPUs. I am repeatedly facing a rather
> > strange error while running make:
> >
> &
kefile:162: recipe for target 'all' failed
make: *** [all] Error 2
I have installed cuda 9.1, openmm, fftw, open-mpi and all other necessary
software, so I'm at a loss. Please help me out. Google did not have much
leads.
Thank you.
Regards,
Rajat
--
Dr. Rajat Desikan (Post Doctoral Fellow)
Prof.
her possibility is to downgrade boost to older, but you can bump into
> other mish-mash issues. I do not recommend that.
>
>
>
> On Sunday, August 27, 2017, 11:36:21 PM GMT+3, Rajat Desikan <
> rajatdesi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear All,
> I had removed gromacs 5
.
Is there any way to go about this? Repeating the simulation is
unfortunately not an option. Thanks.
Regards,
--
Rajat Desikan (Ph.D Scholar)
Prof. K. Ganapathy Ayappa's Lab (no 13),
Dept. of Chemical Engineering,
Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search
, 2014 at 9:49 AM, rajat desikan rajatdesi...@gmail.com
wrote:
Dear All,
SASA calculations of a solvated protein in a rhombic dodecahedron gives
the
following warning:
WARNING: non-rectangular boxes may give erroneous results or crashes.
Analysis based on vacuum simulations
.
Regards,
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 6:36 PM, rajat desikan rajatdesi...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thank you, Tsjerk. I will take a look. Are there any compatibility issues
with a 4.6.4 trajectory and GMX 5 analysis tools?
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Tsjerk Wassenaar tsje...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi
/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org javascript:;.
--
Rajat Desikan (Ph.D Scholar)
Prof. K. Ganapathy Ayappa's Lab (no 13),
Dept. of Chemical Engineering,
Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 2:27 PM, rajat desikan rajatdesi...@gmail.com
javascript:;
wrote:
Hi,
As an example, assuming that I have four chains (A,B,C,D) and want to
select residue 14 in chains A,B and D
1 r 14 chain A|1 r 14 chain B| 1 r 14 chain D
://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org javascript:;.
--
Rajat Desikan (Ph.D Scholar)
Prof. K. Ganapathy Ayappa's Lab (no 13),
Dept. of Chemical Engineering,
Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore
--
Gromacs Users mailing
.
--
Rajat Desikan (Ph.D Scholar)
Prof. K. Ganapathy Ayappa's Lab (no 13),
Dept. of Chemical Engineering,
Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
* Can't post? Read
!
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org javascript:;.
--
Rajat Desikan (Ph.D Scholar)
Prof. K. Ganapathy Ayappa's Lab
trajectory). Since Pratibha wants to test her own code, the way she treats
pbc is something to keep in mind.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:
On 10/8/14 3:21 AM, rajat desikan wrote:
Hi,
You need to use -pbc nojump to calculate the msd. Using -pbc whole
://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
posting!
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
--
Rajat Desikan
/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
--
Rajat Desikan (Ph.D Scholar)
Prof. K. Ganapathy Ayappa's Lab (no 13),
Dept. of Chemical Engineering,
Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive
Hi,
I assumed that you had gone through the forcefield.ff files on Slipids
webpage. You need to include the following section at the end in your
ffnonbonded.itp (some of the spaces may be missing below). I suggest
modifying a local copy of your desired Amber ff.
; SLIPIDS STARTS HERE
HAL11
/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
--
Rajat Desikan (Ph.D
...@gromacs.org.
--
Rajat Desikan (Ph.D Scholar)
Prof. K. Ganapathy Ayappa's Lab (no 13),
Dept. of Chemical Engineering,
Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
* Can't
posting!
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
--
Rajat Desikan (Ph.D Scholar)
Prof. K. Ganapathy Ayappa's Lab
Hi Eric,
Sorry, I misread your mail. You cannot compute the vacuum accessible
surface area for a liquid because the molecules are in constant motion.
Regards,
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 9:15 PM, rajat desikan rajatdesi...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Eric,
1) Yes. Use a probe radius of 0 nm.
2
or not that output is meaningful to you is
up to you; I have never dealt in vacuum-accessible SA.
-Justin
Thanks again Rajat,
Best,
Eric
Message: 7
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 21:17:36 +0530
From: rajat desikan rajatdesi...@gmail.com
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users gmx-us...@gromacs.org
/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
--
Rajat Desikan (Ph.D Scholar)
Prof. K. Ganapathy Ayappa's Lab (no 13),
Dept. of Chemical Engineering,
Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http
...@gromacs.org.
--
Rajat Desikan (Ph.D Scholar)
Prof. K. Ganapathy Ayappa's Lab (no 13),
Dept. of Chemical Engineering,
Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting
.
--
Rajat Desikan (Ph.D Scholar)
Prof. K. Ganapathy Ayappa's Lab (no 13),
Dept. of Chemical Engineering,
Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
* Can't
Thank you for the clarification, Prof. David.
On Tuesday, May 13, 2014, David van der Spoel sp...@xray.bmc.uu.se wrote:
On 2014-05-13 07:52, rajat desikan wrote:
Hi All,
In many papers, the authors cite the main gromacs paper and simply declare
in the methods section that they used
--- Thank You ---
--
Rajat Desikan (Ph.D Scholar)
Prof. K. Ganapathy Ayappa's Lab (no 13),
Dept. of Chemical Engineering,
Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List
is different from that for P alone.
Cheers,
Tsjerk
On May 9, 2014 10:53 PM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:
On 5/9/14, 3:35 PM, rajat desikan wrote:
Thanks Justin. I am curious about the value for a phosphorus atom
(protein
in phospholipid bilayer; g_sas issues a warning). Do you
ffnonbonded values? I would love to hear your
thoughts/suggestions.
Thanks,
--
Rajat Desikan (Ph.D Scholar)
Prof. K. Ganapathy Ayappa's Lab (no 13),
Dept. of Chemical Engineering,
Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http
to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
--
Rajat Desikan (Ph.D Scholar)
Prof. K. Ganapathy Ayappa's Lab (no 13),
Dept. of Chemical Engineering,
Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX
I forgot to mention that the earlier simulations were with version 4.5.4
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 6:13 PM, rajat desikan rajatdesi...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I would suggest caution. I had a DPPC bilayer interacting with organic
molecules (beta naphthol) which are supposed to alter the phase
. g_potential returns the
result for epsilon_r = 1. How can I incorporate this into the result?
2) Default ng =1? Is the number of groups referring to the number of charge
groups defined in the topology?
Thank you for your time.
--
Rajat Desikan (Ph.D Scholar)
Prof. K. Ganapathy Ayappa's Lab (no 13
g_potential literally?
Thanks,
On Monday, April 21, 2014, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:
On 4/21/14, 9:58 AM, rajat desikan wrote:
Hi All,
I have a membrane-protein-solvent system, and I want the potential across
the membrane in the direction of the membrane normal. I have 2
Update for anyone interested: Installing dssp 2.2.1 solved the above error!
I am not sure why...
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 11:39 AM, rajat desikan rajatdesi...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi All,
I get this error while running do_dssp. The program reads the whole
trajectory but fails to write a scount file
(by dividing the vector by their norm) and calulate their
# dot-product in excel.
# The dot product of two normalized vectors is the cosine of their
# cross-angle.
Disclaimer: Copied from an old gromacs discussion.
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 2:06 PM, rajat desikan rajatdesi...@gmail.com
wrote
Hi All,
Any suggestions?
Thanks.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 5:01 PM, rajat desikan rajatdesi...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi All,
I am trying to calculate the angle between the axes of two alpha helices
(say A and B) in my simulation. I have separate index files for the
residues pertaining to each
-nxy shows 27 data sets.
What do these correspond to? (Helix A has 34 residues). Similarly for
bending_A.xvg
How do I go about this? Is this the right way to calculate the relative
helix axis angle?
Thanks,
--
Rajat Desikan (Ph.D Scholar)
Prof. K. Ganapathy Ayappa's Lab (no 13),
Dept
is the reciprocal space term in a Ewald summation
calculation, right? I want the total potential energy of the protein. How
would I go about that?
Thanks.
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 7:39 PM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:
On 1/15/14, 7:14 AM, rajat desikan wrote:
Hi All,
I was wondering about
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
--
Rajat Desikan (Ph.D Scholar)
Prof. K. Ganapathy Ayappa's Lab (no 13),
Dept. of Chemical Engineering,
Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
-Users_List before
posting!
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
--
Rajat Desikan (Ph.D Scholar)
Prof. K
}...
Any idea about how to proceed. I am quite stumped.
Thanks.
--
Rajat Desikan (Ph.D Scholar)
Prof. K. Ganapathy Ayappa's Lab (no 13),
Dept. of Chemical Engineering,
Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http
next time...
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 8:55 AM, rajat desikan rajatdesi...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi All,
I have a NPT NAMD trajectory of a membrane-protein that I want to analyze
in gromacs 4.6.3. (g_density). I used catdcd
before
posting!
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
--
Rajat Desikan (Ph.D Scholar)
Prof. K. Ganapathy
...@gmail.comwrote:
On Nov 21, 2013 9:20 AM, rajat desikan rajatdesi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I was wondering about the coulomb-modifier = Potential-shift-Verlet
option
in conjunction with the Verlet cut-off scheme and PME.
I can understand that vdw-modifier = Potential-shift
46 matches
Mail list logo