Re: [gmx-users] grompp is using a very large amount of memory on a modestly-sized system

2019-03-11 Thread Sean Marks
e to test with, so that we can improve the > simplistic implementation! Please upload it if you can. > > Mark > > On Fri., 8 Mar. 2019, 19:24 Sean Marks, wrote: > > > Scratch that comment about sparseness. I am short on sleep, and for a > > moment thought I was talking about

Re: [gmx-users] grompp is using a very large amount of memory on a modestly-sized system

2019-03-08 Thread Sean Marks
Scratch that comment about sparseness. I am short on sleep, and for a moment thought I was talking about constraints, not electrostatics. On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 1:12 PM Sean Marks wrote: > I understand now, thank you for the prompt response. While the matrix > would actually be quite

Re: [gmx-users] grompp is using a very large amount of memory on a modestly-sized system

2019-03-08 Thread Sean Marks
-water electrostatics while leaving other interactions unaffected? One alternative I considered was manually scaling down the charges themselves, but doing this causes the lattice to lose its form. On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 12:28 PM Justin Lemkul wrote: > > > On 3/8/19 11:04 AM, Sean Marks wrot

[gmx-users] grompp is using a very large amount of memory on a modestly-sized system

2019-03-08 Thread Sean Marks
Hi, everyone, I am running into an issue where grompp is using a tremendous amount of memory and crashing, even though my system is not especially large (63976 atoms). I am using GROMACS 2016.3. My system consists of liquid water (7,930 molecules) next to a block of ice (8,094 molecules). The