I do not see the attachment... Which forcefield are planning to use? In any
case you should check the input pdb you are using: are the amino acid residues
named in the proper way? It is a standard pdb? Do you have some non-natural
amino acid or modified residue in your peptide? Moreover you
;
> have a look maybe helpful if your molecule is hydrocarbon
> http://zarbi.chem.yale.edu/ligpargen/
>
>
>
>> On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 9:54 AM Valerio wrote:
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I have been trying to obtain opls forcefield for small molecules.
&g
in combination with
ffconv.py script to generate the topology.
Unfortunately the link for the ffconv.py link is expired and it is not possible
to download it anymore.
Can someone please send me the script or mailing me the code?
Thanks a lot in advance.
Valerio
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
and it is not possible
to download anymore.
Can someone please send me the script or mailing me the code?
Thanks a lot in advance.
Valerio
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
* Can't post
and it is not possible
to download anymore.
Can someone please send me the script or mailing me the code?
Thanks a lot in advance.
Valerio
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
* Can't post
).
I have also tried to calculate just the number and perform the calculation
with gmx analyze using the -luzar option but again I have segmentation
fault...
Can anyone tell me if I am doing something wrong and how to follow the
right procedure?
Thanks a lot in avvance.
Valerio Ferrario
analysis... Reducing
the time I obtain the same relaxation values With better integrals:
Hydrogen bond thermodynamics at T = 300 K
One-way 0.030 33.376 13.321
Integral 0.085 11.729 10.713
Relaxation 1.038 0.963 4.478
Valerio
2017-08-29 14:01 GMT+02
Dear all,
I am trying to obtain parameters for h-bonds. I used the tool gmx hbonds
with -ac option but resulted in segmentation fault. Therefore from the
normal gmx hbond output I used gmx analyze to obtain the autocorrelation
function. Therefore, using again gmx analyze with -luzar options and
. Moreover
the trajectory seems very good, with the protein perfectly superposed and
with the same orientation in each trajectory step. Is there a way to define
the interaction? i.e. the 2 selected groups interacts when they are within
a given distance?
Best,
Valerio
2017-06-28 3:29 GMT+02:00 Dallas
that the density should be just around the protein (in this case).
Moreover I have just positive values for the isosurface, is that normal? Am
I doing something wrong?
Thanks a lot,
Valerio Ferrario
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX
Hi Justin,
I need the LJ potential just between the two DNAs, instead gmx energy
calculates the total LJ energy. Is it right?
Valerio
Il giovedì 14 gennaio 2016, Justin Lemkul <jalem...@vt.edu
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jalem...@vt.edu');>> ha scritto:
>
>
> On 1/14/16
Hi Justin,
You are right!! Thanks a lot!! Your help was precious.
Again thanks.
Valerio
2016-01-14 18:26 GMT+01:00 Justin Lemkul <jalem...@vt.edu>:
>
>
> On 1/14/16 12:18 PM, valerio di giulio wrote:
>
>> Hi Justin,
>>
>> I need the LJ potential just betw
elements
Last energy frame read 500 time 500.000
Will build energy half-matrix of 2 groups, 0 elements, over 501 frames
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
...
Although I have written to the .mdp file:
energygrps = DNA1 DNA2
Thank you in advance,
Valerio Di Giulio
--
Gromac
tp"
; Include generic ion topology
#include "amber03.ff/ions.itp"
[ system ]
Two all-AT in water
[ molecules ]
DNA11
DNA21
SOL 39390
NA 190
CL 146
.
Thanks,
Valerio
2016-01-13 20:40 GMT+01
14 matches
Mail list logo