Hi Dr. Justin Lemkul,
Thank you for responding again. I'm still not understanding it :(.
I'll try to be more clear. Taking the example of OPLS UA, we have
different atom types for united alkene atoms (-CH= and CH2=) and alkanes
(-CH2-). When I represent the connections in n2t file, the
Thank you for the response.
In case of an all atom representation, the connections are different. What
about a united atom representation? The g_x2top supports Gromacs 53a5
forcefield right?
Can we get a topology with x2top only for an all atom representation? Or is
there anyway to get it for
Dear gromac users,
I'm using g_x2top (4.6.7 version), to generate a topology. The compound
contains double bonds. I have a problem in setting correct topology.
The C1 in both the cases -C1H=C2H2 and -C1H2- is being assigned the same
type, though I'm mentioning different distances in the n2t file.
Hi Justin Lemkul,
Thank you very much for the reply. I have tried using
x2top for generating topology. I copied contents of opls ff to poly ff and
added some atoms and ran the command. The output was as follows:
GROMACS is written by:
Emile Apol Rossen Apostolov Herman
Dear Gromacs Users,
I have started to use Gromacs recently to
simulate certain properties of polymer hydrogels. I have taken Poly Vinyl
Alcohol cross linked with Glutaraldehyde as my system. In this system, I
have taken two long chains of polymers and cross linked