Re: [gmx-users] "Too many LINCS warnings" in a minimization after solvation with coarse-grained waters

2019-01-25 Thread ZHANG Cheng
Dear All, (hope this message can be put under the original thread) I solved this problem. The reason is, I was trying to fill the system with water then minimise it, which is not good. The better way is, prepare a waterbox that is even larger than the system box. Then minimise that water

Re: [gmx-users] "Too many LINCS warnings" in a minimization after solvation with coarse-grained waters

2019-01-22 Thread Fotis Baltoumas
Hello Cheng, The lines at the end of this mail are the extra parameters we usually define in our lab whenever we need to use soft potentials. They are based on the parameters given by CHARMM-GUI for the Martini Maker.  However, you *may* need to make alterations if there are conflicts with

Re: [gmx-users] "Too many LINCS warnings" in a minimization after solvation with coarse-grained waters

2019-01-22 Thread ZHANG Cheng
Dear Fotis and Peter, Thank you very much for the help. Fotis, Can I modify the mdp file to use "soft" potential modifier, how to do that? I think my problem is not the first reason (i.e. something wrong with the system structure or topology), because the potential is decreasing for the

Re: [gmx-users] "Too many LINCS warnings" in a minimization after solvation with coarse-grained waters

2019-01-22 Thread Peter Kroon
Hi all, @Fotis, the softcore potential for minimization sounds interesting, I'll remember that! Alternatively, something we also occasionally do in the lab, is replace all constraints for stiff bonds during minimization and if needed the first bit of equilibration. Peter On 22-01-19 13:24,

Re: [gmx-users] "Too many LINCS warnings" in a minimization after solvation with coarse-grained waters

2019-01-22 Thread Fotis Baltoumas
Hello all, I would like to point out step 2 of the original poster's message: /2) Then 10 of this protein were inserted to a box, followed by a />>/minimization. It "stopped because the algorithm tried to make a new step />>/whose size was too small, or there was no change in the energy

Re: [gmx-users] "Too many LINCS warnings" in a minimization after solvation with coarse-grained waters

2019-01-22 Thread Peter Kroon
Hi, You can reduce the timestep during equilibrations to e.g. 10 fs, or 5 when you have a really bad starting configuration. Bring it back up to 20 (in steps if needed) before starting your actual equilibration/production though. In addition, you can raise the lincs_order to 8. And yes, the

Re: [gmx-users] "Too many LINCS warnings" in a minimization after solvation with coarse-grained waters

2019-01-22 Thread Mark Abraham
Hi, I don't have any experience of coarse-grained systems, but everything looks OK from this level. It is normal to troubleshoot by visualizing your input and progress result. Minimizers are local, so if you start from something that has a frustration that can't be resolved, you are stuck.

Re: [gmx-users] "Too many LINCS warnings" in a minimization after solvation with coarse-grained waters

2019-01-21 Thread ZHANG Cheng
I also tried to reduce the "emtol" gradually in the mdp file, i.e. from 1000 to 100 to 10. It passed the "emtol = 1000" but it stopped again at "emtol = 100", i.e. outputting dozens of pdb files before the "LINCS warnings". Then I looked at the edr files. The potential in "emtol = 1000" and

[gmx-users] "Too many LINCS warnings" in a minimization after solvation with coarse-grained waters

2019-01-21 Thread ZHANG Cheng
I am doing coarse-grained (CG) modelling for 10 proteins in a box. I was told "Too many LINCS warnings" in the minimization after solvation with coarse-grained waters. I try to diagnose the problems based on http://manual.gromacs.org/documentation/2018/user-guide/terminology.html#blowing-up