Re: [gmx-users] Change to umbrella sampling pull code

2015-08-12 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 8/12/15 4:51 PM, Nash, Anthony wrote: Thanks for clearing that up Justin, I’ve adjusted accordingly. All but one error remains: Pull group 1 'ZINC' has 1 atoms Pull group 2 'CARBONYL' has 1 atoms --- Program grompp, VERSION 5.0.5 Source

Re: [gmx-users] Change to umbrella sampling pull code

2015-08-12 Thread Nash, Anthony
Thanks for clearing that up Justin, I’ve adjusted accordingly. All but one error remains: Pull group 1 'ZINC' has 1 atoms Pull group 2 'CARBONYL' has 1 atoms --- Program grompp, VERSION 5.0.5 Source code file: /home/columbus/chem_software/GROM

Re: [gmx-users] Change to umbrella sampling pull code

2015-08-12 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 8/12/15 3:20 PM, Nash, Anthony wrote: Hi Mark, Thanks for the reply. Comparing the documentation between manual-4.5.6 (what I had previously been using) and manual-5.0.4: 4.5.6 has reference to pull_group0 as reference group, and in 5.0.4 there is no explicit mention (that I can see) to a

Re: [gmx-users] Change to umbrella sampling pull code

2015-08-12 Thread Nash, Anthony
Hi Mark, Thanks for the reply. Comparing the documentation between manual-4.5.6 (what I had previously been using) and manual-5.0.4: 4.5.6 has reference to pull_group0 as reference group, and in 5.0.4 there is no explicit mention (that I can see) to a reference group but there is one for the pul

Re: [gmx-users] Change to umbrella sampling pull code

2015-08-12 Thread Mark Abraham
Hi, On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 6:20 PM Nash, Anthony wrote: > Dear all, > > This is the first time I¹ve ran pull code (for umbrella sampling) since > the change from Gromacs 4 to gromancs 5. I¹ve noticed some difference in > the .mdp key-value parameters. Could I have a sanity check on the values >

[gmx-users] Change to umbrella sampling pull code

2015-08-12 Thread Nash, Anthony
Dear all, This is the first time I¹ve ran pull code (for umbrella sampling) since the change from Gromacs 4 to gromancs 5. I¹ve noticed some difference in the .mdp key-value parameters. Could I have a sanity check on the values below. Also, given that I want a harmonic potential between the two gr