The following paper may also be interesting.
"System-size corrections for self-diffusion coefficients calculated from
molecular dynamics simulations: The case of CO2, n-alkanes, and
poly(ethylene glycol) dimethyl ether" J. Chem. Phys. 145, 074109 (2016);
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4960776
See the following paper
(http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ct400109a) for some examples of
diffusion calculations in GROMACS.
The finite size correction for diffusion coefficients is something
different than the long range energy corrections. A discussion of this
(I can't vouch for all the
Hi,
I would also consider using a pressure-coupling algorithm that isn't known
to create the wrong velocity distribution.
Mark
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
* Can't post? Read
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 21:49:45 +0530
From: Nikhil Maroli <scinik...@gmail.com>
To: gromacs.org_gmx-users@maillist.sys.kth.se
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Diffusion coefficient water
Message-ID:
er (li he)
>
>
>--
>
>Message: 1
>Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 21:49:45 +0530
>From: Nikhil Maroli <scinik...@gmail.com>
>To: gromacs.org_gmx-users@maillist.sys.kth.se
>Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Diffusion coefficient water
>Message-ID:
>
4. you could even try NVT ensemble
2016-08-18 2:25 GMT+08:00 li he :
> I think you could try following things to see if you could get 'better'
> results
> 1. use time step of 0.2 or even 0.1 fs
> 2. try different tau-t and tau-p, e.g. use larger tau-t
> 3. try
I think you could try following things to see if you could get 'better'
results
1. use time step of 0.2 or even 0.1 fs
2. try different tau-t and tau-p, e.g. use larger tau-t
3. try different p-coupling methods
2016-08-17 23:28 GMT+08:00 Diez Fernandez, Amanda <
amanda.die...@imperial.ac.uk>:
>
On 8/17/16 11:28 AM, Diez Fernandez, Amanda wrote:
Dear Gromacs users,
I was trying to reproduce the published values for the diffusion coefficient of
SPCFw water (2.3 +/- 0.08 x 10^-9 m^2/s )before using it in some of my
simulations and I am failing to do so.
More worryingly I get
I don't think we can reproduce the exact results in MD .The overall
behaviour of the system will be same .so it's obvious
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
* Can't post? Read
Dear Gromacs users,
I was trying to reproduce the published values for the diffusion coefficient of
SPCFw water (2.3 +/- 0.08 x 10^-9 m^2/s )before using it in some of my
simulations and I am failing to do so.
More worryingly I get different results for different identical runs.
I am using a
10 matches
Mail list logo