Re: [gmx-users] Fwd: Adding new atom types

2018-09-06 Thread Thomas Piggot
I'm not sure off the top of my head. The manual says: "Pair parameters that are not present in the [ pairtypes ] section are only generated when gen-pairs is set to “yes” in the [ defaults ] directive of forcefield.itp" so it sounds like the parameters in the [ pairtypes ] section should be

Re: [gmx-users] Fwd: Adding new atom types

2018-09-06 Thread Alex
Hi Tom, Thanks for the informative response. For the Gromos FF the gen-pairs is "no" and then the 1-4 interactions are taken from the parameters existed [ pairtypes ], if I change the gen-pairs to "yes" in Gromos FF, would you please confirm me that the parameters in [ pairtypes ] is still in

Re: [gmx-users] Fwd: Adding new atom types

2018-09-06 Thread Thomas Piggot
The GROMOS force fields are somewhat different to the others in that they provide specific 1-4 interactions by having several different C12 parameters for one atomtype (in some cases). The C12 value used depends upon the atomtypes involved in the interactions (see tables 7 and 8 of

[gmx-users] Fwd: Adding new atom types

2018-09-06 Thread Alex
Dear all, Any idea please about my both questions below? The c6 in both [ nonbond_params ] to [ pairtypes ] comes from the combination rule of c6ij = (c6ii + c6jj)/2 but I could not find any rule about c12 in either sections! Thanks. Alex -- Forwarded message - From: Alex