y value. Thanks again.
>
>
>
> > Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 17:13:01 -0400
> > From: Justin Lemkul <jalem...@vt.edu>
> > To: gmx-us...@gromacs.org
> > Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Higher Density than Expected
> > Message-ID: <571e885d.2030...@vt.edu>
> &
: that the system is too inhomogeneous to
pay that close attention to the absolute density value. Thanks again.
> Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 17:13:01 -0400
> From: Justin Lemkul <jalem...@vt.edu>
> To: gmx-us...@gromacs.org
> Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Higher Density than Expected
>
On 4/25/16 5:09 PM, Christopher Schlicksup wrote:
Hi, I am fairly new to simulation, and would like some input about whether
I have set up Gromacs correcly. I am using version 5.0.4 with the
CHARMM36-Jun2015 force field and the TIP3P water model. I am simulating a
35kDa protein in a
Hi, I am fairly new to simulation, and would like some input about whether
I have set up Gromacs correcly. I am using version 5.0.4 with the
CHARMM36-Jun2015 force field and the TIP3P water model. I am simulating a
35kDa protein in a dodecahedron box (-d 1.6) with 150mM NaCl plus
neutralizing