Thank you very much Mirco and Szilard for the clarification.
This helps a lot.
Regards,
D.
2015-06-15 16:10 GMT+02:00 Mirco Wahab :
> On 11.06.2015 14:07, David McGiven wrote:
>
>> Your 1-3% claim is based on the webpage you linked ?
>>
>> Is it reliable to compare GPU performances for gromacs
Good data Mirco, but let me emphasize that your measurements only
reflect the case of heavily GPU-bound workloads!
5-6% performance improvement with PCI-E 3.0 vs 2.0 is about the
maximum you'll see when, like in RF runs where, we there is no enough
CPU work to fully overlap with the GPU computatio
On 11.06.2015 14:07, David McGiven wrote:
Your 1-3% claim is based on the webpage you linked ?
Is it reliable to compare GPU performances for gromacs with those of 3D
videogames ?
OK, you got me on this. As much as I'd wish I cannot
really back up my claim of comparability. I have been
out of
Hey Mirco,
Your 1-3% claim is based on the webpage you linked ?
Is it reliable to compare GPU performances for gromacs with those of 3D
videogames ?
Thanks!
2015-06-11 13:21 GMT+02:00 Mirco Wahab :
> On 11.06.2015 13:08, David McGiven wrote:
>
>> We're finally buying some Intel E52650 servers
On 11.06.2015 13:08, David McGiven wrote:
We're finally buying some Intel E52650 servers + NVIDIA GTX980 cards.
However, there's some servers that come with only PCI-e 3.0 x8 slots and
others with x16 slots.
Do you think this is relevant for gromacs performance ? And if so, how much
relevant ?
Dear Gromacs Users,
We're finally buying some Intel E52650 servers + NVIDIA GTX980 cards.
However, there's some servers that come with only PCI-e 3.0 x8 slots and
others with x16 slots.
Do you think this is relevant for gromacs performance ? And if so, how much
relevant ?
Thanks in advance.
Ch