>FWIW, we have a complete CHARMM36 + latest CGenFF available at our website to
>save you some pain: http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/charmm_ff.shtml#gromacs
That looks helpful. Thanks.
>So if it finds a bonded interaction that involves an atom type
>it doesn't know about (e.g. you have a type in
On 11/26/16 2:41 PM, Jonathan Phillips wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to run a simulation of a protein:ligand complex using chamm27
and cgenff2b7. After a little hacking (I'm using a PRES), I've used
charmm2gromacs-pvm.py to convert cgenff2b7 to cgenff2b7.ff/, and then
combined that with the charmm27
Hi,
I'm trying to run a simulation of a protein:ligand complex using chamm27
and cgenff2b7. After a little hacking (I'm using a PRES), I've used
charmm2gromacs-pvm.py to convert cgenff2b7 to cgenff2b7.ff/, and then
combined that with the charmm27 forcefield that comes with gromacs.
pdb2gmx runs
On 10/8/16 2:58 AM, Sameer Edirisinghe wrote:
Dear gromacs users, Dr. Justin,
I managed to run md simulation with the aid of your helps here . As the
next step I'm trying to create a crystal from polymer molecule so i can put
several molecules to the same box and do a simulation. What
Dear gromacs users, Dr. Justin,
I managed to run md simulation with the aid of your helps here . As the
next step I'm trying to create a crystal from polymer molecule so i can put
several molecules to the same box and do a simulation. What approach should
I take here ?
Regards
Sameera
On 9/21/16 7:42 AM, Sameer Edirisinghe wrote:
Dear Dr. Justin,
Thanks for the explanation. Now i got the point you mentioned here. Then i
checked the bonds i have mentioned in .rtp file and then i found the
relevant bonded type. then i checked the ffbonded.itp file and i found that
bond type
Dear Dr. Justin,
Thanks for the explanation. Now i got the point you mentioned here. Then i
checked the bonds i have mentioned in .rtp file and then i found the
relevant bonded type. then i checked the ffbonded.itp file and i found that
bond type is already in there.
As an example,
CAY HA1 ;
On 9/20/16 8:27 AM, Sameer Edirisinghe wrote:
Dear Dr. Justin,
Thanks for the all valuable points here. Please see the below sample bonds
i defined in .rtp file. how to define bond type for them ? i know oplsaa
atom type of each of them. what i dont understand in how to add them to
Dear Dr. Justin,
Thanks for the all valuable points here. Please see the below sample bonds
i defined in .rtp file. how to define bond type for them ? i know oplsaa
atom type of each of them. what i dont understand in how to add them to
ffbonded.itp file. these bonds are general bonds such as C-C
On 9/18/16 10:14 PM, Sameer Edirisinghe wrote:
Dear Dr. Justin,
If the bond types have not added, following errors occuring with grompp,
1) ERROR 1 [file topol.top, line 108]:
No default Bond types
2) ERROR 2 [file topol.top, line 168]:
No default Angle types
3) ERROR 3 [file
Dear Dr. Justin,
If the bond types have not added, following errors occuring with grompp,
1) ERROR 1 [file topol.top, line 108]:
No default Bond types
2) ERROR 2 [file topol.top, line 168]:
No default Angle types
3) ERROR 3 [file topol.top, line 426]:
No default Ryckaert-Bell. types
On 9/18/16 2:26 PM, Sameer Edirisinghe wrote:
Dear Dr. Justin,
Now i can understand what what i have mistaken there. How can i derive
[bondtypes]
for bonds i have used in .rtp file ?
Determine if you need to in the first place. If grompp gives you errors about
missing parameters, first
Dear Dr. Justin,
Now i can understand what what i have mistaken there. How can i derive
[bondtypes]
for bonds i have used in .rtp file ?
Regards
On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 11:38 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
>
>
> On 9/18/16 2:06 PM, Sameer Edirisinghe wrote:
>
>> Dear Dr. Justin,
On 9/18/16 2:06 PM, Sameer Edirisinghe wrote:
Dear Dr. Justin,
If atom names names cant use in ffbonded.itp file how should i add bond
interaction used in .rtp file to ff..itp file ? this is the part i dont
understand. Do i need to modify ffnonbonded.itp file to correct the "Unknown
Dear Dr. Justin,
If atom names names cant use in ffbonded.itp file how should i add bond
interaction used in .rtp file to ff..itp file ? this is the part i dont
understand. Do i need to modify ffnonbonded.itp file to correct the "Unknown
bond_atomtype' error which occurring while runing grompp
On 9/18/16 1:12 PM, Sameer Edirisinghe wrote:
Dear Dr. Justin,
Thanks for the reply. Following is the whole .rtp file i used. ( As you
said it was generated by using PRODRG)
You shouldn't use the charges from PRODRG. They assume a united-atom force
field, and are of very low quality.
On 9/18/16 12:30 PM, Sameer Edirisinghe wrote:
Dear users,
There is one thing i cannot clarify from gromacs manual which is about
following error occurred while running grompp
Fatal error:
Unknown bond_atomtype CAY
I used to create .rtp file from atom types which are already defined in
Dear users,
There is one thing i cannot clarify from gromacs manual which is about
following error occurred while running grompp
Fatal error:
Unknown bond_atomtype CAY
I used to create .rtp file from atom types which are already defined in
atomtype.atp file. But still above error occurring
Thanks Justin,
I think that¹s everything I need to know.
Kind regards
Anthony
Dr Anthony Nash
Department of Chemistry
University College London
On 17/02/2016 22:18, "gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se on
behalf of Justin Lemkul"
On 2/17/16 5:11 PM, Nash, Anthony wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the information, Mark. I fully parameterised the bonded terms
using QM data and some software I wrote. Now that I’ve sorted out
ffnonbonded [atomtypes], all that remains are some missing angle terms. I
want to have the forcefield files
Hi,
Thanks for the information, Mark. I fully parameterised the bonded terms
using QM data and some software I wrote. Now that I’ve sorted out
ffnonbonded [atomtypes], all that remains are some missing angle terms. I
want to have the forcefield files correct so an MD simulation can be
generated
Hi,
Your MOD residues are LYS connected by a ring, so the atom types and bonds
sections should be pretty much as for LYS, with the ring parts perhaps
along the lines of TYR. If you have done a full parameterization somehow
and have specialized atom types, then yes, those bonded and non-bonded
Dear Mark,
I didn’t expect the problem was in ffnonbonded.itp. Problem solved. Thanks
for the earlier hint.
Anthony
On 17/02/2016 18:01, "gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se on
behalf of Nash, Anthony"
Hi Mark,
Further to my earlier email. I’ve answered the query as to whether atom
types and names can be the same. This is fine, judging by The N N and O O
in all of the amino acid types.
I suspect I either have an additional problem or I have identified the
root cause of my original problem.
Hi Mark,
Thanks for the reply. I’m a little confused when you say “Choose existing
types”. Are you saying that I am confined to only those atom types that
come along with the forcefield upon installation, or that I can add new
types but I’ve made a slight mishap between when specifying them
Hi,
You've specified a type for your atom in [atoms] and elsewhere a bond that
uses it. Grompp has to find parameters for a bond between those two types,
etc. Choose existing types ;-)
Mark
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 17:27 Nash, Anthony wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As per a previous email
Hi all,
As per a previous email (cross linking two peptide chains), I¹ve created a
brand new crosslink (think disulphide bond) residue from scratch. I have
defined it in all the files necessary (.rtp, residuetypes, specbond,
atomtypes, ffbonded, ffnonbonded) and it has got past pdb2gmx with no
27 matches
Mail list logo