Re: [gmx-users] What is the most reliable way to run repeats for reproducibility?

2018-01-11 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 1/10/18 9:59 AM, ZHANG Cheng wrote: Hi Mark, Thank you very much. ) For the link you provide, I think I could not manipulate most of the computer resources, as I submit my jobs to our cluster, and the jobs are distributed to different available cores randomly. ) For "random seed" of ve

Re: [gmx-users] What is the most reliable way to run repeats for reproducibility?

2018-01-10 Thread ZHANG Cheng
Hi Mark, Thank you very much. ) For the link you provide, I think I could not manipulate most of the computer resources, as I submit my jobs to our cluster, and the jobs are distributed to different available cores randomly. ) For "random seed" of velocity, I found here and I enabled this opt

Re: [gmx-users] What is the most reliable way to run repeats for reproducibility?

2018-01-10 Thread Mark Abraham
Hi, See http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Terminology/Reproducibility. Some people think they want reproducibility of a trajectory, which is generally not needed, and not consistent with highly efficient sampling (particularly with GPUs involved). But what you actually want is not reproducibil

[gmx-users] What is the most reliable way to run repeats for reproducibility?

2018-01-10 Thread ZHANG Cheng
Dear Gromacs, I can think of different ways of running repeats, after reading Justin's lysozyme tutorial. The 1st way: all starting from the same em.tpr after energy minimization (EM) and use em.tpr individually for subsequent steps (NVT, NPT and production MD): ) repeat 1: same em.tpr ?? NVT ?