Re: [gmx-users] Why "do_dssp" gives one more residue?

2018-02-21 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 2/21/18 1:04 PM, ZHANG Cheng wrote: Dear Justin, Thank you. But it does not make sense to me. Do you know if separator line is always all the ~ ? If the separator line is following the 214th residue, the 215th residue should be the separator line, but why the 215th residue contains the

Re: [gmx-users] Why "do_dssp" gives one more residue?

2018-02-21 Thread ZHANG Cheng
Dear Justin, Thank you. But it does not make sense to me. Do you know if separator line is always all the ~ ? If the separator line is following the 214th residue, the 215th residue should be the separator line, but why the 215th residue contains the secondary structure? You can find my files

Re: [gmx-users] Why "do_dssp" gives one more residue?

2018-02-21 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 2/21/18 12:34 PM, ZHANG Cheng wrote: Dear Qinghua, Yes, exactly! But the numbering is: 1-214: first chain 215-442: second chain However, for the secondary structure codes: 214th:

Re: [gmx-users] Why "do_dssp" gives one more residue?

2018-02-21 Thread ZHANG Cheng
Dear Qinghua, Yes, exactly! But the numbering is: 1-214: first chain 215-442: second chain However, for the secondary structure codes: 214th:

Re: [gmx-users] Why "do_dssp" gives one more residue?

2018-02-21 Thread Qinghua Liao
Hello, Maybe you have two chains in your system, then there should be one for chain separator. Best, Qinghua On 02/21/2018 06:20 PM, ZHANG Cheng wrote: Dear Gromacs, My protein only has 442 residues. After running gmx do_dssp -f md_0_1_noPBC.xtc -s md_0_1.tpr -ssdump ssdump.dat -map

[gmx-users] Why "do_dssp" gives one more residue?

2018-02-21 Thread ZHANG Cheng
Dear Gromacs, My protein only has 442 residues. After running gmx do_dssp -f md_0_1_noPBC.xtc -s md_0_1.tpr -ssdump ssdump.dat -map ss.map -o ss.xpm -sc scount.xvg -a area.xpm -ta totarea.xvg -aa averarea.xvg -tu ns In the ss.xpm file, I got 443 numberings, i.e. y-axis is numbered from 1 to