Re: [gmx-users] correcting timesteps

2019-06-19 Thread Mark Abraham
Hi, As with another answer I gave earlier today, many tools don't have good handling of time steps and particularly their differences, once there are a lot of significant digits in the times recorded. You could try using gmx tools from a double-precision build, but that might not help. The step

[gmx-users] correcting timesteps

2019-06-17 Thread Leigh
Hello I fudged a restart on gromacs 2018 and am missing 195 femtoseconds from my trajectory. This shouldn't matter because I only need a 10 picosecond resolution trajectory. However, when I try to correct the timestep with trjconv and -timestep it doesnt seem to have done anything. *gmx trjconv

[gmx-users] correcting timesteps

2019-06-12 Thread Leigh
Hello I fudged a restart on gromacs 2018 and am missing 195 femtoseconds from my trajectory. This shouldn't matter because I only need a 10 picosecond resolution trajectory. However, when I try to correct the timestep with trjconv and -timestep it doesnt seem to have done anything. *gmx trjconv