Re: [gmx-users] cut-off scheme

2020-01-16 Thread Dhrubajyoti Maji
Many thanks for your reply. These links are really helpful. On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 14:51, Alessandra Villa < alessandra.villa.bio...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > my suggestion is to move to Verlet scheme - > ( > http://manual.gromacs.org/documentation/2019/user-guide/cutoff-schemes.html > ) > See

Re: [gmx-users] cut-off scheme

2020-01-16 Thread Alessandra Villa
Hi, my suggestion is to move to Verlet scheme - (http://manual.gromacs.org/documentation/2019/user-guide/cutoff-schemes.html ) See also for http://manual.gromacs.org/documentation/2020/release-notes/2019/major/deprecated-functionality.html#functionality-deprecated-in-gromacs-2019 You could

[gmx-users] cut-off scheme

2020-01-14 Thread Dhrubajyoti Maji
Dear all, I have found in some old literatures where force field parmetrizations were done, they have used group cut-off scheme which was default in gromacs version then. Now, if I want to use those parameters in updated gromacs version, do I have to take cutoff scheme as group ? Or can I