Hi,
Probably not - it wasn't parameterised for such usage, and any such
re-deployment would require careful validation . Your background reading on
your choice of model physics is your best guide to doing good physics. :-)
Mark
On Wed, 3 Jun 2015 07:55 Ming Tang m21.t...@qut.edu.au wrote:
Dear gromacs experts,
I tried to use gromos 54a7 force field to calculate persistence length of a
helix in implicit solvent, but got GB parameters missing errors. When I tried
to modify the implicit_genborn_params section, I found there is not gbsa.itp
file in gromos54a7.ff
does gromos force
