Szilárd already activated it a couple of hours ago (just noticed he
replied to me only). The issue is already submitted also. Thanks anyway.
Best,
Antonio
On Wed, 19 Feb 2014, Mark Abraham wrote:
It shows as active to me...
Mark
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:46 PM, Antonio Baptista wrote:
O
It shows as active to me...
Mark
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:46 PM, Antonio Baptista wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Justin Lemkul wrote:
>
>
>>
>> On 2/7/14, 6:08 PM, Antonio Baptista wrote:
>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> This is a follow-up to an old thread on g_principal, which continues (as
>>> of
>>
On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Justin Lemkul wrote:
On 2/7/14, 6:08 PM, Antonio Baptista wrote:
Dear all,
This is a follow-up to an old thread on g_principal, which continues (as of
version 4.6.5) to suffer from what I would call a bug or, at least, a very
bad
and misleading choice of output file name
On 2/7/14, 6:08 PM, Antonio Baptista wrote:
Dear all,
This is a follow-up to an old thread on g_principal, which continues (as of
version 4.6.5) to suffer from what I would call a bug or, at least, a very bad
and misleading choice of output file names. This message is primarily a further
warni
Dear all,
This is a follow-up to an old thread on g_principal, which continues
(as of version 4.6.5) to suffer from what I would call a bug or, at
least, a very bad and misleading choice of output file names. This
message is primarily a further warning to users, but I also hope that it
promot
