Hi Aishwarya,
besides distances, the only other physical quantities that enter into the
calculation of moments of inertia are the masses of the particles, so
looking only at the apparent radius at VMD is not enough to say anything
about your results.
so either your systems are indeed different an
Hi,
Yes of course the ratios are similar. The shapes are similar
But when I measure the distance of the two agrregates in VMD , the length
of the aggregates and the width of the aggregates are more or less of the
same dimensions. Which means that the size of the aggregates are
comparable and there
Hi,
Yes of course the ratios are similar. The shapes are similar
But when I measure the distance of the two agrregates in VMD , the length
of the aggregates and the width of the aggregates are more or less of the
same dimensions. Which means that the size of the aggregates are
comparable and there
https://mailman-1.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-users/2019-January/123938.html
Catch ya,
Dr. Dallas Warren
Drug Delivery, Disposition and Dynamics
Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University
381 Royal Parade, Parkville VIC 3052
dallas.war...@monash.edu
--
Hi,
I am trying to find the moment of inertia of an aggregate.
I have used the command gmx gyrate -f test.gro -s test.gro -p yes -mol
yes -o out.xvg
For two aggregates the the shape is similar but the values are
very different for Ix Iy Iz
For an aggregate 1
Ix Iy I
Solution to what exactly?
Both sets have a ~1:3:3 ratio, I'd guess you have two prolate spheroids?
and it indicates that yes, they have a similar shape as you stated.
Or is the concern the fact that there is ~4x difference between agg1 and
agg2 I values? That indicates that agg1 is bigger than a
Hi,
I am trying to find the moment of inertia of an aggregate.
I have used the command gmx gyrate -f test.gro -s test.gro -p yes -mol
yes -o out.xvg
For two aggregates the the shape is similar but the values are
very different for Ix Iy Iz
For an aggregate 1
Ix Iy I
